Laserfiche WebLink
4. Due to the analysis presented in item 3. above as well as the revised text and <br />map given in Exhibit G, the Operator elects not to install piezometers and <br />undergo groundwater monitoring. <br />5. The Reclamation Plan Map (Exhibit F) has been revised to remove the extra <br />permit boundary line. <br />6. The SWSP has been revised to include evaporative losses associated with <br />the Pfeiff pond until such time as the leak test can be completed. The plan <br />dedicates 5/6th of a share of Big Thompson Ditch & Mfg. water rights, which <br />has a firm yield of 76.55 acre -ft per year based on the City of Loveland's <br />change of use case 2002CW392. The combined stream depletion for the <br />unlined BNER and Pfeiff pond is 35.32 acre -ft per year, therefore the water <br />rights dedication should be more than adequate. This discussion has been <br />included in the SWSP. Approval of the revised SWSP by the SEO will affirm <br />the adequacy of the dedicated water rights. <br />I have also enclosed the proof of mailing and publication for the amended <br />application. <br />Peter Wayland <br />President <br />Encl. Flying W Groundwater Modeling Report, Revised SWSP, proof of Mailing and <br />Publication <br />WiI Weiland, Inc. <br />Environmental E Engineering <br />