My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016-01-14_REPORT - M1980244 (15)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Minerals
>
M1980244
>
2016-01-14_REPORT - M1980244 (15)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:14:32 PM
Creation date
1/15/2016 2:27:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980244
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
1/14/2016
Doc Name
Final Report Quality Assurance Monitoring & Test Results
From
Cripple Creek & Victor Gold Mining Company
To
DRMS
Email Name
TC1
ERR
AME
WHE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Cripple Creek & Victor Gold Mining Company <br />Squaw Gulch VLF Phase 1 <br />(9,550-foot Elevation Bench to Geomembrane Panel P1635) <br />Final Report <br />Quality Assurance Monitoring & Test Results <br />January 2016 <br />Project No.: 74201125N0 Page 29 <br />7.0 Project Deviations <br />7.1 Drawing Deviations <br />During construction several adjustments were made in the field to fit actual site <br />conditions during construction. A list of those changes are discussed below. <br />• Localized changes in grading occurred throughout the project during construction. <br />These slight deviations have been recorded in the ROC drawings in Appendix A. <br />These changes occurred to adjust to actual field conditions to better accommodate <br />the design intent. <br />• Localized changes in underdrain and HVSCS pipe alignments occurred throughout <br />the project during construction. These slight deviations have been recorded in the <br />ROC drawings in Appendix A. These changes occurred to adjust to actual field <br />conditions to better accommodate the design intent. <br />• Details 2 and 3 on IFC Drawing A220 indicate a fusion weld between the phased <br />liner connections. An extrusion weld was used instead and is acceptable. <br />The above drawing additions or deviations meet the intent of the SQVLF design as <br />permitted. <br />7.2 Project Technical Specification Deviations <br />During construction, requests were made by the contractor (Ames) to deviate from the <br />project technical specifications. Below is a summary of the project technical specification <br />deviations. <br />• Section 02776 (Appendix E) of the project technical specification states “The rolls <br />(of liner) shall be stored on a prepared surface (not wooden pallets) and should not <br />be stacked more than two rolls high”. Amec Foster Wheeler allowed the rolls of liner <br />to be stacked three rolls high provided safety measure were in place to prevent rolls <br />from shifting at any time and personnel refrain from climbing on the rolls to access <br />the lifting straps. <br />• The resin lot certificates provided for the welding rod do not match the resin lots used <br />during production of the 80-mil DSMS LLDPE geomembrane; since the resin is the <br />same, the lots were accepted for use per project technical specifications. Extrusion <br />weld integrity was verified with trial welds and destructive tests. <br />• Amec Foster Wheeler allowed the use of Low Volume Solution Collection Fill <br />material in place of LDF. The properties of the two materials are very similar, and
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.