Laserfiche WebLink
Wagner/Kaufmann No. 3 SWSP Page 5 of 6 <br />December 21, 2015 <br />replacement of depletions, past intervening headgate to ensure that such water is not <br />intercepted or otherwise diminished in quantity by diversion, use or other interference by <br />intervening water rights and to assure that such water remains available and suitable for <br />Applicant's uses under this SWSP, except when any intervening headgate is diverting the <br />entire flow of ("sweeping") the river. In the event that delivery past headgate which sweep <br />the river requires the installation of a bypass structure or the use of an existing bypass <br />structure by agreement with a third -party, Applicant is responsible for either installation a <br />new bypass structure with a continuous recording measuring device(s) as approved by the <br />Water Commissioner or securing an agreement with a third -party to use an existing bypass <br />structure and providing such information and agreement to the Division Engineer. <br />16. The approval of this substitute water supply plan does not relieve the Applicant and/or the <br />landowner of the requirement to obtain a water court decree approving a permanent plan for <br />augmentation or mitigation to ensure the permanent replacement of all depletions, including <br />long-term evaporation losses and lagged depletions after gravel mining has ceased. If <br />reclamation of the mine site produces a permanent water surface exposing groundwater to <br />evaporation, an application for a plan for augmentation must be filed with the Division 1 <br />Water Court at least three (3) years prior to the completion of mining to include, but not be <br />limited to, long-term evaporation losses. If a lined pond results after reclamation, <br />replacement of lagged depletions shall continue until there is no longer an effect on stream <br />flow. Granting of this plan does not imply approval by this office of any such court <br />application(s). <br />17. Dewatering at this site will produce delayed depletions to the stream system. As long as the <br />pit is continuously dewatered, the water returned to the stream system should be adequate to <br />offset the depletions attributable to the dewatering operation. Once dewatering at the site <br />ceases, the delayed depletions must be addressed. Accordingly, dewatering is required to <br />continue during the term of this approval. At least three years prior to completion of <br />dewatering, a plan must be submitted that specifies how the post pumping dewatering <br />depletions (including refilling of the pit) will be replaced, in time, place and amount. <br />18. If dewatering of the site is discontinued, the pit would fill creating additional depletions to <br />the stream system due to increased evaporation. To assure that additional depletions to the <br />river do not occur, a bond for $570,000 has been obtained through the Colorado Division of <br />Reclamation, Mining, and Safety ("DRMS") for lining or backfilling of the pits. Therefore, if <br />the dewatering is discontinued this bond can finance the completion of the lining of these pits <br />or the backfilling, thus preventing depletions to the stream system. This bond is required to <br />be in place until the two liners are approved by the State Engineer's Office and until DRMS <br />authorizes their release, or a partial release. <br />19. This substitute water supply plan may be revoked or modified at any time should it be <br />determined that injury to other vested water rights has or will occur as a result of this plan. <br />Should this substitute water supply plan expire without renewal or be revoked prior to <br />adjudication of a permanent plan for augmentation, all excavation of product from below the <br />ground water table and all other use of water at the pit must cease immediately. <br />20. In accordance with amendments to §25-8-202(7), C.R.S., and Senate Bill 89-181 Rules and <br />Regulations adopted on February 4, 1992, the State Engineer shall determine if the substitute <br />supply is of a quality to meet requirements of use to which the senior appropriation receiving <br />the substituted supply has normally been put. As such, water quality data or analysis may be <br />requested at any time to determine if the requirements of use of the senior appropriator are <br />met. <br />