My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2015-12-16_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981035 (3)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981035
>
2015-12-16_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981035 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:13:28 PM
Creation date
12/18/2015 10:45:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981035
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
12/16/2015
Doc Name
Air Quality Issues
From
Luke Danielson
To
DRMS
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Email Name
RAR
DIH
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
land use application pending before the county proposes to continue this activity means that it <br />proposes to continue exceed established health based norms. <br />This certainly makes compatibility very hard to find, which makes the search for viable <br />alternatives even more critical. <br />PERTINENT FINDINGS <br />The air quality modeling reported was conducted based on several alternative sets of <br />assumptions. A key finding is that the Primary NAAQS for PM1Q are violated in each and all of <br />these scenarios. <br />The limit of the primary standard, the 24-hour PM10 NAAQS is 150 µg/m3. The report finds: <br />"A number of scenarios were analyzed to generate results from different traffic <br />levels,. model options, and dust control factors." Report at 2. <br />"For all modeled scenarios, the H6H concentrations at the five <br />residents/structures located cbsest to the unpaved section of County Road 120 <br />exceed the 24-hour PM 10 NAAQS..... Figures 3 through 7 present H6H 24-hour <br />PM10 concentration contours for Scenarios A through E, respectively. The figures <br />also present the predicted concentrations at the five residents/structures where <br />the impacts exceed the NAAQS. Figure 8 shows detail of the concentration <br />contours n our selected residences for Scenario D. The con centrotior+ ranges for <br />each scenario at the five resident/structure locations are detailed Below: <br />Scenario A (Figure 3) - H6H impacts range from 245 to 469 �tg/m3 <br />Scenario B (Figure 4) - H6H impacts range from 160 to 280 pg/m3 <br />Scenario C (Figure 5) - H6H impacts range from 302 to 571 uglm3 <br />Scenario D (Figure 6) - H6H impacts range from 195 to 340 tCg/m3 <br />Scenario E (Figure 7) - H6H impacts range from 384 to 679 pg/m3" <br />Report at 8. (emphasis supplied). <br />Further, <br />"The results indicate possible adverse health effects to these residents, as EPA's <br />primary PM10 NAAQS is designed to protect public health. An FPA publication <br />exploining the health effects from particulate pollution and an EPA fact sheet <br />containing information an the PM10 NAAQS ore attached to this document." <br />Report at 2. <br />It is worth noting that the range of assumptions in these scenarios was conservative and more <br />likely understates than overstates actual exposures: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.