My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2015-10-13_REVISION - C1981014 (18)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981014
>
2015-10-13_REVISION - C1981014 (18)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/15/2021 2:09:39 PM
Creation date
10/15/2015 7:43:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981014
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
10/13/2015
Doc Name
Appenidx G 2013 Vegetation Data
From
Energy Fuels Coal, Inc
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
SL3
Email Name
RDZ
JRS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
88
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
shrubs was the fourth most dominant plant form, contributing 1.05% of the total plant cover and <br />3.96% of the total relative plant cover. Noxious weeds was the fifth most dominant plant <br />category, contributing 0.05% of the total plant cover or 0.18% of the total relative plant cover on <br />this site. <br />Blue Grama as the most dominant plant species encountered, contributing 9.00% of the total plant <br />cover or 33.94% of the total relative plant cover. Russian Thistle, was the second most dominant <br />plant species,, contributing 4.05% of the total plant cover or 15.26% of the total relative plant <br />cover. The third most dominant species was Sand Dropseed, which contributed 3.52% of the total <br />plant cover or 13.29% of the total relative plant cover. Alkali Sacaton, was the fourth most <br />dominant plant, contributing 3.14% of the total plant cover or 11.85% of the total relative plant <br />cover. <br />The locations of the 21 cover transects sampled on this site are shown on Map 20, Loadout <br />Reference Area - 2013 Transect Map. The sample adequacy calculations in Table 2, 2013 <br />Mine -Statistical Summary and Sample Adequacy Calculations, document that the number of <br />transects required to characterize the "total plant cover" was 6.0 transects and 11.2 transects for <br />"allowable plant cover" at the 90% confidence interval. <br />When IME sampled this site in 2007, during what was one of the wettest years in decades, it was <br />determined that total canopy cover averaged 39.00%. All warm season species contributed <br />30.86% of the total plant cover or 79.13% of the total relative cover. The two most dominant <br />warm season species contributed 27.54% of the total cover or 70.62% of the total relative cover. <br />When Keenan, Inc., sampled an undisturbed site very close to this reference area in 1980, total <br />basal cover averaged 19.35%. All warm season species contributed 11.92% of the total basal <br />cover and accounted for 61.60% of the total relative cover. The two dominant warm season <br />species contributed 64.18% of the total relative cover. <br />Forage Production. The results obtained from the sampling of the 30 forage production transects <br />are found in Table 22, Loadout Reference Area — 2013 Production. Forage production <br />averaged 8.37 g/1/4 m2 or 298.3 pounds per acre. Perennial grasses produced 7.41 g/1/4 m2 or <br />264.1 pounds per acre and accounted for 88.5% of the forage production. Perennial forbs <br />produced 0.96 g/1/4 m2 or 34.2 pounds per acre and accounted for 11.5% of the forage production. <br />The locations of the 30 forage production transects sampled on this site are shown on Map 20, <br />Loadout Reference Area - 2013 Transect Location Map. The sample adequacy calculations in <br />Table 2, 2013 - Statistical Summary and Sample Adequacy Calculations, document that the <br />number of samples required to describe this site at the 90% confidence interval with respect to the <br />parameter of forage production was 55.6 transects. <br />When IME sampled this site in 2007, forage production averaged 41.36 g/1/4 m2 or 1,474.4 <br />pounds per acre. Perennial grasses produced 35.34 g/1/4 m2 or 1,259.5 pounds per acre and <br />accounted for 85.4% of the forage production. Perennial forbs produced 6.03 g/1/4 m2 or 214.9 <br />pounds per acre and accounted for 14.6% of the forage production. <br />Species Diversity. All warm season grass species contributed 16.52% of the total plant cover or <br />62.29% of the total relative cover. The two most dominant warm season plant species contributed <br />12.52% of the total plant cover or 47.21% of the total relative plant cover. The four most <br />dominant plant species contributed 19.71% of the total plant cover or 74.32% of the total relative <br />plant cover. <br />18 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.