Laserfiche WebLink
Response: In May 2015 the water balance of the VLF was upset by an increased and <br />unexpected volume of flow crossing over from the Phase 5 drainage to the Phase 1 drainage. <br />Discussion of the factors and effects are detailed in the response communicated to DBMS on <br />July 7, 2015. After weighing various options CC&V elected to install misters on the solution <br />piping network in order to 1) bring all pond levels in to compliance as soon as possible and 2) <br />reduce the overall volume of circulating solution. The efforts were successful on both accounts <br />and flows have stabilized. <br />Due to the unusually wet weather in the late spring and early summer, shedding the excess <br />solution from the circuit required prolonged use of the misters/evaporators. This resulted in <br />above normal accumulation of precipitated salts on the surface near the misters. The salts formed <br />a surficial scale/crust that prevented the unevaporated solution from infiltrating into the pad <br />efficiently. This caused an increase in the incidence and persistence of ponding on the VLF. <br />CC&V took measures to mitigate the ponds as they formed by re -ripping areas, installing <br />sumps/drains, and relocating/rotating flows to areas. <br />Starting in mid-August CC&V began removing/plugging the installed misters. A staged step- <br />wise approach was adopted to avoid making any abrupt flow changes that could otherwise <br />progress through the circuit and cause future upsets. In preparation of the upcoming change in <br />seasons, targets were set to have all non -drip flows shut off by the end of September. The <br />schedule has been followed and it has been possible to advance the completion date. All <br />misters/evaporators should be out of service the week of 21 September 2015. <br />INSPECTION TOPIC: Support Facilities Not On-site <br />PROBLEM/POSSIBLE VIOLATION: Problem: The observed ponded water on the AGVLF <br />surface appears to have saturated the surface and may pose geotechnical slope instability <br />problems. <br />CORRECTIVE ACTIONS: Provide a geotechnical slope stability analysis assuming saturated <br />material exits to the appropriate depth to assess the impact on the factors of safety presented in <br />the MLE2/Amendment 10 slope stability exhibit. <br />CORRECTIVE ACTION DUE DATE: 9/23/15 <br />Response: <br />No evidence that saturation of the ore near surface, or deeper, occurred has been observed by <br />CC&V. The principle reason for occurrence ofponding has been accumulation of <br />scale/precipitates (primarily calcium carbonate) from process solutions occluding the surface <br />and reducing the infiltrateablity. In all instances ponding has been able to be mitigated <br />expeditiously by breaking up the surficial crusts. There has been no indication of saturation any <br />appreciable distance below the surface beyond conditions already considered in <br />MLE2/Amendment 10 slope stability exhibit. <br />