My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2015-08-03_REVISION - P2009025 (5)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Prospect
>
P2009025
>
2015-08-03_REVISION - P2009025 (5)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 11:33:55 AM
Creation date
8/4/2015 8:01:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
P2009025
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
8/3/2015
Doc Name
Appeal of Office Decision MD03
From
Lee J Alter
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
MD3
Email Name
TC1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The BLR description of the one -hole test suggests that the water will be recycled in operation. There has <br />been no discussion as to the extent of water treatment prior to re-injection into the borehole and how <br />much make-up water would be required. This also could have an impact on the geochemistry. <br />Every description of the complete UBHM process prior to the current application includes mention of a <br />requirement for a 22"-24" diameter borehole which would include both the water injection system and <br />the "air-lift" slurry recovery system. BLR's statement that a 12" borehole would be adequate for the <br />requested one -hole pilot test appears to contradict previously published information. A much more <br />complete explanation should be requested. <br />Chemistry and Geochemistry <br />The question of the amount of dissolved oxygen that will be in the water injected through the borehole <br />into the face of the orebody was completely misrepresented by BLR in its responses to DRMS staff. At <br />standard temperature and atmospheric pressure there is normally a small amount of oxygen found in <br />water. BLR is correct that at approximately 8000 feet of altitude at the Hansen site, the oxygen <br />concentration in water would be less than at sea level or even at 5000 feet. In fact, when water would be <br />transported from Canon City as proposed by BLR, some of the dissolved oxygen would be expected to <br />bubble out of solution at the Hansen site due to the reduced barometric pressure as altitude increases. <br />The issue, however, is how much atmospheric oxygen would be dissolved into the water as it is being <br />pressurized on site prior to injection into the borehole. The capacity for water to incorporate oxygen into <br />solution is a function of the pressure at the interface of the water and air. Henry's law is one of the gas <br />laws formulated by William Henry in 1803. It states: <br />"At a constant temperature, the amount of a given gas that dissolves in a given type and volume <br />of liquid is directly proportional to the partial pressure of that gas in equilibrium with that liquid." <br />An equivalent way of stating the law is that the solubility of a gas in a liquid is directly proportional to the <br />partial pressure of the gas above the liquid. [https:Hen.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry's law] <br />Since it has not been disclosed by BLR to what degree the compressor will pressurize the water to be <br />injected (that question should have been asked!), it is not now known how much oxygen could be <br />dissolved into the water. Theoretically, since solubility is proportional, one- hundred times standard <br />atmospheric pressure (1500 psi or 100 Bar) would result in a one -hundred times increase in dissolved <br />oxygen. The actual concentration of DO must be determined empirically. <br />However much oxygen is carried down the borehole —at a significantly higher level than normal -- as the <br />pressure drops as the cavern is being excavated, molecular oxygen will bubble out of solution and be <br />available to chemically react with the freshly created ore fragments. <br />That is a classic description of an oxidizing environment. <br />It is true, as BLR stated in its response to the Deficiency Notice, that the intact underground orebody is a <br />reducing environment, as it has been since the uranium oxide was originally "reduced" and deposited <br />from its oxidized soluble U+6 state to the insoluble U+4 state in prehistoric times. That chemical <br />conversion, from an oxidizing to a reducing environment, can be, and is, reversed when strong oxidizers <br />are present. That is precisely what occurs in In -Situ Leach Solution Mining and is expected to occur to a <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.