My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2015-06-30_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981010
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981010
>
2015-06-30_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:08:46 PM
Creation date
7/2/2015 8:47:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981010
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
6/30/2015
Doc Name
2015 Midterm Review Findings and Cost Estimate (MT7)
From
DRMS
To
Trapper Mning, Inc
Permit Index Doc Type
Findings
Email Name
TNL
DIH
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
217
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• On January 8, 2015, the Division sent Trapper a letter regarding archeological resource <br />site 5MF948. Trapper's permit Section 2.9 and Appendix K indicate the site is located <br />in Section 8 of Township 5 North, Range 90 West of the 6th principal meridian and is <br />outside of the permit area. Permit map M45 depicts this site to be located in Section <br />8 outside of the permit area. The Division conducted an inspection of the site on <br />December 10, 2014. The Division collected a GPS point at the site and confirmed that <br />the site is located in Section 5 within the permit area. According to permit page 4-3a, <br />the site is 3,600 feet away of the closest proposed mining disturbance. Based on the <br />GPS point collected by the Division, the site will be about 700 feet from the mining <br />projected to occur in 2016 based on map M10a in permit. Given Trapper's current <br />mining plan, flyrock and airblasts will not likely affect site 5MF948. However, ground <br />vibration, if large enough, might affect the sandstone upon which the petroglyphs are <br />painted. The Division requested that Trapper submit a technical revision to update <br />the following information: <br />1.) Revise sections 2.9 and 4.1 of the permit to indicate the site is located within the <br />permit boundary. <br />2.) Revise permit section 2.9 to indicate the correct location of the site and to note <br />the error of the location cited in the cultural resource report included in Appendix <br />K for this site. <br />3.) Revise permit section 4.1 to indicate how far the site will be from the projected <br />mining disturbance. <br />4.) Evaluate whether the mining setback from the site is far enough away from <br />blasting, and given the expected sizes of the blasts, that the site won't be affected. <br />Once this is completed, please revise sections 2.9 and 4.1 of the permit to include <br />the results of this evaluation. In accordance with Rule 2.05.6(4), if additional <br />protective measures are found to be necessary, please discuss them in the revised <br />sections. <br />5.) Please update Map M45. <br />2.05.3 Operation Plan/Permit Area <br />2.05.3(4) <br />• The Division was unable to locate as -built drawings for the ponds listed below. Please <br />indicate where these can be found or provide drawings conforming to the standards in <br />Rules 4.05.6 and 4.05.9 <br />■ East Pyeatt #3 <br />■ Middle Pyeatt #1, #2, #3 <br />■ Ute <br />■ Johnson #6, #7R, #8, #9R, #10R <br />■ No Name #2, #4, #5R <br />• Please update table 4.8.7 with design specifications for all of the ponds. <br />Trapper Midterm 2015 Findings TNL_2.docx Page 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.