My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2015-07-01_REPORT - C1980007
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Coal
>
C1980007
>
2015-07-01_REPORT - C1980007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/29/2017 10:16:09 AM
Creation date
7/2/2015 8:33:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
7/1/2015
From
Hydro Geo, Inc
To
DRMS
Annual Report Year
2014
Permit Index Doc Type
Hydrology Report
Email Name
JRS
MPB
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
70
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
West Elk Mine 2014 Annual Hydrology Report 46 <br />5.0 ASSESSMENT OF MINE -INDUCED HYDROLOGIC IMPACTS IN <br />WY 2014 AND ANTICIPATED IMPACTS IN WY 2015 <br />5.1 Surface Water <br />MCC maintains a network of 23 stream flow gauging stations and eight temperature <br />monitoring stations throughout the permit and lease areas (Table 3, Map 2). Daily mean <br />surface water flow summary tables are presented in Appendix A. Surface water flow <br />hydrographs are presented in Appendix B and the field and laboratory surface water <br />quality data are summarized in Appendix C. Tables and graphs of the Sylvester Gulch <br />and North Fork temperature monitoring data are presented in Appendix I and Appendix J, <br />respectively. <br />5.1.1 Impacts to Area Stream Water Quality <br />As mentioned previously, surface water quality data are collected for permit -specified <br />parameters at monitoring stations throughout the permit area, in order to detect potential <br />impacts of mining activities to surface water resources. Potential impacts to water quality <br />in area streams are determined by comparing recent water quality and flow data to <br />baseline values while considering effects of climatological factors, such as drought or <br />high precipitation in areas near mining activity. Monitoring sites with values greater than <br />10 percent over comparable baseline maximums are noted in the discussion below. Field <br />pH values were used for comparison when they were available, as the holding time for <br />the lab pH is typically exceeded, due to the shipping time required for samples to reach <br />the analytical lab. In general, water quality parameters that are above 10 percent over <br />baseline maximums are likely due to natural variations in climate or flow conditions on <br />the day the sample was collected. Impacts that appear to be directly linked to mining <br />activities are noted. It should also be noted that baseline values are based on limited data <br />and only give a general indication of seasonal variability. The surface water quality data <br />for WY 2014 are presented in Appendix C. <br />In WY 2014 none of the tested parameters were elevated 10 percent or more above <br />maximum baseline values at the following surface water monitoring locations: Upper <br />North Fork, Lower Minnesota Creek, Lower Dry Fork, Lick Creek, Upper Raven Gulch, <br />and Lower Raven Gulch. The Horse Gulch and Box Canyon sites were dry, so there are <br />no water quality data for these sites in WY 2014. There are no baseline data for <br />comparison for Upper Minnesota Creek (WWE, 2001). <br />Data from two sampling rounds (May 20 and September 23, 2014) plus one duplicate for <br />each sampling round were collected at the Lower North Fork monitoring site in WY <br />2014. The May 2014 total iron concentrations at this site were 4.21 mg/L (4.29 mg/L <br />duplicate) compared to the baseline maximum of 3.8 mg/L. The May 2014 total <br />suspended solids (TSS) concentrations were 133 mg/L compared to the baseline <br />maximum of 107 mg/L. <br />Data from one sampling round (May 21, 2014) were collected at Upper Sylvester Gulch <br />in WY 2014. Three parameters were elevated 10 percent or higher than the maximum <br />baseline values. Field measured electrical conductivity (EC) values were 733 µmhos/cm <br />June 2015 HydroGeo, Inc. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.