Laserfiche WebLink
Tom Bird, GCC Energy 01 Jun -2015 <br />C-1981-035 2014 ARR Ver. 3 Review Page 2 of 2 <br />seedmixes should be indicated, and seedtags, invoices or other comparable documentation <br />should be included; <br />DRMS 04/17: No new areas were seeded in 2014. <br />DRMS 05/27: The cumulative total for King I was revised to reflect the updated acreages <br />reflected on the map. However, it seems the acreage shown for "Last Year's Cumulative Total" <br />should be 2.05 rather than 1.05 acres, and "This Calendar Year" should be -1.06 rather than -0.06 <br />acres. Please revise the Acres Seeded category, as appropriate. <br />DRMS 06/01: The acreages were revised, as requested. In future years, please expand the <br />discussion to describe any weed control activities conducted, including products / methods <br />used, and species targeted. <br />ARR Form — Other <br />DRMS 05/27: The acreages reported under the Government Performance and Results Act <br />heading should be revised as follows: The "long-term mining or reclamation facilities" is the <br />difference between the acres disturbed and the acres seeded. For King I, this would be 14.43 <br />acres (15.42 — 0.99); at King II, the number should be 24.50 acres (25.50 — 1.00). For both <br />mines, the acreage in active mining areas is 0.0. Please update the forms to reflect these <br />numbers. <br />DRMS 06/01: The acreages were revised, as requested. <br />This concludes the Division's review of the 2014 Annual Reclamation Report for the King Coal <br />Mine. You are welcome to contact me with any questions. <br />Best regards, <br />Marcia L. Talvitie, P.E. <br />Environmental Protection Specialist <br />