My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2015-05-28_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981008
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981008
>
2015-05-28_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:00:49 PM
Creation date
5/29/2015 2:36:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981008
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
5/28/2015
Doc Name
Prime farmlands Comment
From
JoEllen Turner
To
DRMS
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Email Name
DIH
BFB
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
May 28 15 07:59p Joellen 9708647682 p.4 <br />But, using cropland as the rate, it was way way high. <br />There is no cropland in this AREA or any other AREA in <br />Colorado that is of record that produces 4.5 ton per acre <br />first cutting. So, Ross Gubka went around to each and <br />EVERY farmer in this area and got their production rates <br />for first cutting, INCLUDING Mel Staats signed letter <br />included. The production rate was submitted to the State <br />based on NORMAL HUSBADRY practices and reduced <br />to 1.5 ton per acre first cutting. The State had never dealt <br />with all these types of individual farms and farmers. All <br />of them different. This was the only mine in the State <br />that had so many different things to take into <br />consideration and all the rules should have been read but <br />were not. The rules also require THREE consecutive <br />years, so then it was messed up again. The normal <br />husbandry practices around here also do soil sampling <br />and put the amount expected for production and <br />FERTILIZE according to what is needed for EACH farm. <br />The state would not allow that and I put on fertilizer 100 <br />pounds per acre of 18/46 which is very very, minimal, as <br />low as the fertilizer trailer can run. We were dealing with <br />state and nine people that had never farmed a day in their <br />lives and di not know ONE rule. So, mistakes were made <br />again and again. They then acquired a reference area by <br />another revision. In this revision, they must submit X <br />amount of samples such as 33. They paid a veg company <br />25,000 to come out and do this study but they only did 31 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.