My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2015-05-13_INSPECTION - C1981035
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Inspection
>
Coal
>
C1981035
>
2015-05-13_INSPECTION - C1981035
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:00:15 PM
Creation date
5/18/2015 8:19:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981035
IBM Index Class Name
Inspection
Doc Date
5/13/2015
Doc Name
Inspection Report
From
DRMS
To
GCC Energy, LLC
Inspection Date
4/28/2015
Email Name
MLT
DIH
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
April 28, 2015 C- 1981- 035/King Coal Mine MLT <br />• The outer slope is covered with soil substitute, which was previously seeded. The lowest <br />slope is black in appearance, due to fines having blown over from the former stack tube and <br />pad. <br />• An area of loose material appeared to have been scaled from the portal highwall. The <br />Division required that this be done, in order to ensure a firm back surface is present, against <br />which coal mine waste backfill will one day be placed. <br />PROCESSING WASTE /COAL MINE WASTE PILES — Rule 4.10 and 4.11 <br />Drainage Control; Surface Stabilization; Placement: <br />Dumped loads of coal mine waste were present on top of the Refuse Pile and in the <br />temporary storage area where the tipple once stood. This material awaits permanent <br />placement in the refuse pile. <br />REVEGETATION — Rule 4.15 <br />Vegetative Cover; Timing: <br />According to the Annual Reclamation Report, an area south of the King II Sediment Pond <br />was seeded in 2008. That area (outlined on Photo 1), appears to be covered with Kochia, and <br />may be the main source for tumbleweeds that have been found to accumulate at the site in <br />recent years. Management of this area that was previously disturbed will be important, in <br />order to achieve success of the revegetation. <br />AIR RESOURCE PROTECTION — Rule 4.17: <br />• No fugitive emissions from either the roads or the coal handling equipment were apparent in <br />the photos. <br />• The surfaces of the roads at King II appeared to be damp. <br />Number of Partial Inspection this Fiscal Year: 9 <br />Number of Complete Inspections this Fiscal Year: 4 Page 3 of 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.