Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. David Heintz <br />Duckworth SWSP <br />May 6, 2015 <br />Depletions <br />Page 2of10 <br />Evaporation and Mining Operations <br />Water uses at the Duckworth Pit site include evaporation from the exposed surface are <br />of the dewatering trenches and silt ponds, dust suppression and water lost with the mined <br />product. From August 2014 through July 2015 only the south half of the Phase 2 area will be <br />actively mined. The dewatering trenches that surround the perimeter of the south half of the <br />Phase 2 area are approximately five feet wide by 2,950 feet long, which is equal to a total of <br />0.34 acres of exposed surface area. Net evaporative depletions are calculated using a gross <br />annual evaporation of 40 inches per year per NOAA Technical Report NWS -33. This is reduced <br />by applying a credit of 9.4 inches for effective precipitation which is 70% of the average <br />annual precipitation based on Longmont 2, CO (IDii5116) NOAA weather station. Based on a <br />projected exposed acreage of 0.34 acres from August 2014 through March 2015, the total net <br />evaporative depletion will be 0.44 acre-feet for this plan period, shown on Table 1. <br />The Applicant has estimated that 4.35 acre-feet of water wilt be used for dust <br />suppression at the site and will occur during the months of aggregate production. Mining is <br />expected to occur during this SWSP period with a total amount mined of 308,000 tons. The <br />aggregate will be crushed, not washed and mined in a dewatered state. Pursuant to <br />paragraph 13 of the General Guidelines for Substitute Water Supply Plans for Sand and <br />Gravel Pit (April 2, 2011), a 2% moisture content by weight is charged as a ground water <br />diversion. Therefore, 4.53 acre-feet of water is expected to be consumed from the aggregate <br />production during this approval period. <br />The Alluvial Water Accounting System ("AWAS") model was used with the alluvial <br />aquifer boundary condition option to lag depletions to Boulder Creek. The following <br />parameters were used in the model: transmissivity (T) = 35,000 gallons per day per foot, <br />distance (X) from the centroid of the surface of the exposed ground water to the river = 4,400 <br />feet, distance (W) from the aquifer boundary through the exposed ground water to the river <br />channel = 8,800 feet, and specific yield (SY) = 0.2. The location of the stream depletion is <br />assumed to be perpendicular to the river. The lagged depletions due to evaporation and <br />mining operations during the SWSP period are shown in Table 1 and are estimated to total <br />10.0 acre-feet during this approval period. <br />Dewatering <br />The Applicant will dewater the site to allow for dry mining operations using collection <br />ditches that will surround the pit. Under the previous SWSP, the Applicant has pumped the <br />dewatering water to two unlined silt ponds located in the northwest corner of the Duckworth <br />Property as shown in attached Figure 2. Dewatering water that was pumped to the silt ponds <br />was assumed to return to the stream in the same timing as the dewatering depletions. <br />Therefore no credit was taken for dewatering operations at the site and no lagged depletions <br />accrued to the stream system. With the completion of the liner on the north half of Phase 2 <br />area the silt ponds will be removed. For this reason, dewatering water is expected to be <br />pumped to the Cottonwood Pond, which is an unlined pond. As seen in Figure 2, the <br />Cottonwood Pond is located just south of the Duckworth Pit. The Cottonwood Pond is owned <br />and operated by MMM and therefore no agreement is necessary to deliver the Duckworth <br />dewatering water to the pond. The DRMS number for the site is M-1988-042. Depletions at the <br />Cottonwood Pit are replaced pursuant to an agreement with District 6 Water Users <br />Association. Due to the close proximity of the pond to the Duckworth Pit it is assumed that <br />deliveries to the Cottonwood Pond recharge the aquifer and are assumed to return to the <br />stream in the same timing as the dewatering depletions. The Cottonwood Pond was flooded in <br />