My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2015-04-23_REVISION - C1981014 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981014
>
2015-04-23_REVISION - C1981014 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:59:34 PM
Creation date
4/28/2015 8:56:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981014
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
4/23/2015
Doc Name
2nd Adequacy Review
From
DRMS
To
Energy Fuels Coal, Inc.
Type & Sequence
TR43
Email Name
LDS
DIH
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
George V. Patterson, Energy Fuels Coal, Inc. <br />Page 5 <br />April 23, 2015 <br />in 2003 for this purpose. MWNW has been described as a monitoring well throughout the <br />PAP and other documents, which is inaccurate; really it is simply a cased hole, open to <br />the mine workings. Nevertheless, and as stated on page 2.05.6 -53, the purpose of this <br />monitoring point is to: <br />"...track progressive mine flooding, water levels and water quality." <br />EFCT Drill holes SR-14 and SR61 have been confirmed as being sealed and reclaimed. <br />Concerning MW -NW, the DRMS approved MW -NW for the groundwater monitoring <br />program and DRMS needs to support the approval <br />DBMS: On page 2.05.641 the mine inflow rate is estimated as 330 Acre feet per year. <br />Using the previously quoted figure of 5,700 Acre feet as the maximum volume of the <br />mine cavity, the mine would be expected to refill completely in 17 years. It is noted that <br />the analysis of BBA suggests that the rate of mine inflow was overestimated. Without a <br />data point in the mine workings none of the assumptions that underlie any of the <br />estimates or models can be verified, and the rate at which the mine is refilling will remain <br />a matter of conjecture. <br />EFC1: The DRMS' above reference to 330 acre feet per year of mine inflow and that the <br />mine would be expected to completely refill in 17 years is out of context. The calculations <br />shown on Page 2.05.6 -41 of the PAP (permit) were generated from data compiled in the <br />early years of the mining operations at Southfield. Mining records from the Annual <br />Hydrology Reports (AHR's) document that approximately 85% of the mine inflow was <br />pumped and metered for accuracy throughout the mining operations at Southfield. <br />Review of the records from 1985 through 2000, which was the active mining period of <br />EFCI at Southfield, document that the highest recorded mine inflow during any one year <br />was 135.3 acre feet, which occurred in 1985. During subsequent years, the inflow rate <br />steadily decreased down to 10.3 acre feet at the close of mining operations in Year 2000. <br />DBMS: i) Please provide monitoring data from MWNW, in accordance with the <br />approved water monitoring plan described in Exhibit 25. This data should be used in <br />a detailed analysis of the impact of the Southfield Mine on groundwater quantity. The <br />analysis should also include the data collected from the other groundwater monitoring <br />points and be used to validate any modeling conclusions. (If it is determined that <br />MWNW must be replaced, the Division would appreciate the opportunity to discuss <br />an alternative location for the new monitoring well) <br />EFCT Monitoring well MW -NW is being monitored within 20 vertical feet of the Southfield <br />mine workings (353 bgs). Given the weak roof conditions in the Is` North mine section, <br />where MW -NW is located, it is likely that the 20 vertical foot reach is an open void, (a roof <br />fall, typical of the 1 s` North Section) if so, the 20 foot void would be part of the mine <br />workings in the area of MW -NW. Nonetheless, it has been proven that MW -NW is open to <br />water flow to the mine workings at a flow rate exceeding 100 gallons per minute. <br />Concerning the Division's comment about the possibility of a new well in a new location, <br />installing another monitor well at Southfield would be contradictory to the Boulay June <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.