My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2015-04-23_REVISION - C1981014 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981014
>
2015-04-23_REVISION - C1981014 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:59:34 PM
Creation date
4/28/2015 8:56:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981014
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
4/23/2015
Doc Name
2nd Adequacy Review
From
DRMS
To
Energy Fuels Coal, Inc.
Type & Sequence
TR43
Email Name
LDS
DIH
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
George V. Patterson, Energy Fuels Coal, Inc. <br />Page 4 <br />April 23, 2015 <br />mine personnel. This recorded inflow data is quite sufficient to make a reasonable <br />projection for the approximate time required for refilling of the mine. <br />Bishop- Brogden and Associates (BBA) has prepared a detailed response to the Division's <br />technical evaluation of the Southfield mine refilling which can be found in APPENDIX <br />"B" attached to this submittal <br />DRMS: In the 2013 Summary Report BBA attempted to model the refilling of the mine <br />using: (i) an estimate of the volume of the mine cavity, and (ii) estimated volumetric rates <br />of mine inflow; with three different scenarios of hydrogeologic connectivity within the <br />workings. The report concluded that the time for the water level in the mine to reach <br />5860.5' would be 106 -200 years. There is significant uncertainty associated with the <br />values of all of the input parameters for this calculation, for example: <br />• There is confusion about the lowest elevation that could be measured at MWNW. <br />• There is uncertainty about the extent to which the mine cavity has collapsed, <br />which has implications for the volume of the remaining cavity. The 5,700 Acre <br />feet value quoted from page 2.05.6 -32 is a maximum value for the volume of the <br />cavity, taking no account of subsidence or natural caving. <br />• The mine inflow volumes (summarized in table 1) are quoted to a level of <br />precision that gives a misleading impression of the accuracy of the value. Since it <br />remains unclear how the estimates were made there can be very little confidence <br />in these values. <br />• As acknowledged by BBA, the integrity of the seals within the mine workings is <br />unknown. <br />EFCL- <br />• The elevation of the floor of the mine workings is 5855 feet. The mine workings <br />were 5.5 feet in height in the vicinity ofMW -NW, the referenced elevation of <br />5860.5 feet is the elevation of the roof of the workings where the steel casing was <br />cut off during mining operations; <br />• Subsidence and caving varies with the varying strata types. By approved design, <br />portions of the mine were not pillared (pillars left in place). These areas are <br />depicted on the Southfield Final Closure Map on file with the DRMS, <br />• Mine inflows were monitored and recorded throughout the life of mining <br />operations (Annual Hydrology Reports). Approximately 85% of the inflows were <br />pumped and metered and the data recorded by the Southfield mine engineer and <br />qualified mine personnel; <br />• Integrity of the mine seals is unknown; therefore BBA offered three models of <br />potential conditions that could exist in the mine. <br />DRMS: The ideal location for a well to monitor the rate at which the mine is refilling and <br />the quality of water in the cavity would be at a lower elevation of the mine cavity, <br />perhaps in the West Submain or 2 West Submain, (drill holes SR14 and SR61 would be <br />well located). However the North Dewatering Well was converted to X1W W with TR35 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.