My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2015-03-12_PERMIT FILE - C1981014A (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981014
>
2015-03-12_PERMIT FILE - C1981014A (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:58:14 PM
Creation date
4/28/2015 8:51:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981014A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
3/12/2015
Section_Exhibit Name
2.05.6 Mitigation of Surface Coal Mining Operation Impacts
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
73
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• Freshwater Pond No. 3 (reclaimed) <br />• Sedimentation Pond No. 4 <br />• Mine Substation (scheduled for removal) <br />• Powerlines (most removed during reclamation) <br />• City of Florence Waterline (portions removed while mine was in operation) <br />• Telephone Communications Fines (most removed during reclamation) <br />• Thompson Well *, in Sec. 25. T20S. R70W <br />• Corley Company Well *, Permit No.119459, in NE4,' SE4, Sec.24, T20S, R70W <br />• Corley Company Well *, Permit No.75659, in SW4, NW4, Sec. 19, T20S, R69W <br />• Corley Mine Shop Building *, in Sec. 24. T20S. R70W <br />*Structures added in response to Permit Renewal No. 06 (RN -06) <br />Structures associated with EFCI's mining and related activities, including office, shop, <br />warehouse, preparation plant, and loadout facilities, were not undermined, and <br />therefore, were not affected by subsidence. The configuration of potentially affected <br />structures within the area of concern is illustrated by the Mine Surface Facilities Map. (Map <br />18). EFCI's subsidence inventory does not delineate any renewable resource lands within <br />potentially affected areas. <br />Probable and Worst Case Subsidence; Based on the subsidence report prepared by RMG <br />in 1983 for Dorchester, both the maximum expected probable and worst -case subsidence <br />ranges were predicted. RMG predicted probable maximum vertical subsidence for <br />combined advance and retreat mining to range from 146 to 5.85 feet. These predictions <br />apply to Southfield's overall mine plan within the permit area. Where pillars are left <br />(development extraction only). RMG predicted worst -case vertical <br />subsidence ranging from 2.60 to 4.36 feet. <br />The RMG subsidence predictions and subsidence control plan were used by EFCI during the <br />period of active mining and have proven to be accurate. Actual subsidence monitoring data <br />collected over the past eighteen years by both Dorchester and EFCI indicate vertical subsidence <br />ranging between 0.03 and 3.2 1 feet (Florence Waterline Station I), well within the ranges <br />predicted by RMG. Actual subsidence data can be found on Table 1, High Resolution Grid <br />Survey Data, and in the Semi- Annual Subsidence Reports contained in Exhibit 23, Subsidence <br />Information. <br />2.05.6 -56 Revised: 9/2014 RN -06 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.