My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2015-03-12_PERMIT FILE - C1981014A (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981014
>
2015-03-12_PERMIT FILE - C1981014A (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:58:14 PM
Creation date
4/28/2015 8:51:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981014A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
3/12/2015
Section_Exhibit Name
2.05.6 Mitigation of Surface Coal Mining Operation Impacts
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
73
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• ponds have proven effective in reducing levels of TSS in runoff form mine <br />disturbance areas with resulting effluent levels of TSS well below natural <br />background levels in receiving drainages. However, operation of the <br />sedimentation ponds also has the potential to increase levels of TDS and <br />specific mineral constituents through evaporation and concentration of these <br />components in the impounded runoff. <br />is <br />With the potential for increases in sodium and sulfate concentrations as a <br />result of percolation through the coal refuse pile, the possibility exists <br />for a shift in surface water chemistry within the Magpie and Newlin Creek <br />drainages from a calcium carbonate water type toward a sodium sulfate type. <br />Given the limited volume of flows from the mine relative to total flow volume <br />in Magpie and Newlin Creeks and downstream drainages, and the fact that much <br />of the flow will be lost to the surface water system as previously described, <br />any changes in water chemistry are expected to be localized and will <br />generally be buffered if flows reach Hardscrabble Creek by the significantly <br />greater volume of flow in this downstream drainage. Those flows lost to the <br />surface water system are expected to have a chemical character similar to <br />natural groundwater resources. Similar considerations apply to potential <br />increases in specific chemical constituents, with losses to the groundwater <br />system or mixing and dilution in downstream drainages resulting in effective <br />natural mitigation of surface water chemistry or quality changes. <br />Water Rights Consequences. EFCI's mining, processing and related operations <br />are not expected to impact any currently existing surface or groundwater <br />right. Other than the City of Florence's diversion rights on Newlin Creek <br />upstream of the mine area, there are no surface water rights in or <br />immediately downstream form either the Southfield mine or loadout areas. <br />While surface water rights do exist downstream on Hardscrabble Creek, the <br />City of Florence diversion and resulting dry streambed conditions in Newlin <br />Creek result in a limited hydrologic connection between these downstream <br />rights and mine disturbances areas. Both practical limitations and actual <br />historic water use practices effectively preclude downstream water users from <br />utilizing any water resources originating in the mine area. <br />C:\TK860\V OL.2 \REC. PLN <br />10/24/94 9:10am WP51 /cmc 2.05.6.50 Revised . 9/30/94 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.