My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2015-03-31_HYDROLOGY - M1999050
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Hydrology
>
Minerals
>
M1999050
>
2015-03-31_HYDROLOGY - M1999050
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/10/2017 1:48:06 PM
Creation date
4/1/2015 9:15:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1999050
IBM Index Class Name
HYDROLOGY
Doc Date
3/31/2015
Doc Name Note
April 1, 2015 through March 31, 2016
Doc Name
Substitute Water Supply Plan April 1, 2015 through March 31, 2016
From
DNR Water Resources
To
DRMS
Email Name
MAC
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Replacement water must be provided such that the daily net impact (using the <br />simulated daily numbers from the modeling) is not negative. If a well is out -of- <br />priority for 15 days during a month, replacement must be made only for the 15 <br />days the well is out -of- priority. The replacement must be made, however, on a <br />daily basis as opposed to, for instance, making an aggregated release equal to <br />the volume of the out -of- priority depletions. Likewise, the simulated daily <br />accretion will only count toward replacing the depletion on the days the well is <br />out -of- priority. The accretions that report to the river when the well is in priority <br />cannot be used to replace the out -of- priority depletions. <br />The accretions that impact the river when the well is in priority are not <br />considered "excess" unless the cumulative net impact of the well is not negative <br />for the entire irrigation year to date. (The irrigation year for this purpose is April 1 <br />thru the following March 31.) Until such time as the cumulative net impact is not <br />negative, the accretions must simply be released to the river and cannot be <br />leased to other plans or recaptured. Plans that show a positive cumulative net <br />impact are still required to make replacements on a daily basis; the cumulative <br />analysis only effects whether or not accretions reporting to the river when the <br />well is in priority are considered "excess" and are, therefore, able to be <br />recaptured. <br />7. The basis for determining that the depletions are out -of- priority must be clearly <br />established and all steps in the calculation included in the accounting. The <br />analysis may be done, unless otherwise limited by decree, for each well or <br />groups of wells, provided the most junior water right associated with the group of <br />wells is'used as the reference water right for the group's out -of- priority status. <br />8. Accounting must include actual information for the irrigation year through the <br />month for which the accounting is being submitted AND projections of the plan <br />operation through March 31 of the next calendar year. <br />9. The following naming convention must be used for all files submitted pursuant <br />to item 1: <br />"PIanWDID YYMMDD" <br />where: PIanWDID is the WDID assigned by the division engineer's office <br />YYMMDD corresponds to the date the accounting is submitted. <br />As an example, the assigned WDID for the former GASP plan was 0103333. If <br />accounting using Excel® was submitted for that plan on May 15, 2004, the file <br />name would be: <br />"0103333 040515.xls" <br />The name of the file must be in the subject line of the email. <br />10. All accounting must be reported using the WDID for the structure, at a minimum. <br />Other information such as well name, permit number, etc. may also be included <br />as desired. All wells must be decreed by the water court, permitted by the state <br />engineer or included in a decreed plan for augmentation. Unregistered and <br />undecreed wells cannot, in the opinion of the division engineer, be effectively <br />administered because of the need to know the location, allowable diversion rate <br />and use of the well - information that is only available from the decree or <br />permitting process. <br />Administration Protocol - Augmentation Plan Accounting <br />Revised March 19, 2009 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.