My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2015-03-24_REVISION - C1981014
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981014
>
2015-03-24_REVISION - C1981014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:58:41 PM
Creation date
3/25/2015 8:35:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981014
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
3/24/2015
Doc Name
Adequacy Review Response
From
Energy Fuels Coal, Inc
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
TR43
Email Name
RDZ
MPB
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
111
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Included with this submittal are graphs incorporating all available data for the above parameters, <br />plotted as parameters against time. For this purpose, data are available for wells MW 16, MW23, and <br />MW65. Monitoring data for well MWNW has been collected throughout the monitoring period for the <br />Southfield Mine. No water samples have been collected from the well as the well has been dry to the <br />depth to which levels in the well can be confirmed throughout the monitoring period This monitoring <br />information has been provided to the DRMS since approval was given to commence monitoring the <br />well. <br />An analysis of the data shown on the graphs for the three wells follows. Since there are considerable <br />fluctuations in the data, a moving average trend line is shown on each graph to show a pattern or trend <br />more clearly. <br />Data presented for well MW 16 indicate wide fluctuations in values over time for the indicator <br />parameters including IDS, manganese, and iron. The variations in quality data values, and similar wide <br />fluctuations in water levels, suggest that groundwater in the well is affected by surface water. This well <br />is located in close proximity and dawn -dip from abandoned mine workings within the some monitoring <br />horizon. These mines are believed to be flooded, and are recharged by precipitation. The Southfield <br />mine did not influence MWl6 until close to the end of operations in 2000, when a panel was mined <br />between the well and the old mine works. This mining apparently caused the well to go dry by 2001. <br />Prior to 2001, TDS values are seen to vary widely, then after 2001 trend downward before the well <br />went dry. When the well recharged briefly in 2003 -2005, TDS levels were similar to those measured <br />when mining began in 1980. Similarly, iron and manganese levels fluctuate over time, and after mining <br />ceased in 2000, are at or below the levels when mining began. For the remaining parameters included <br />on the graphs, most show wide values over time with declining values after the end of mining <br />operations. <br />A review of the data for well MW23 shows IDS and manganese levels increasing soon after mining <br />commenced in 1980, then remaining in a close range during and after mining operations. Iron values <br />are high at the start of mining, increase slightly between 2003 and 2010, and then have remained low <br />since 2010. Data shown for the remaining parameters show parameter values generally remaining in a <br />close range from the start of mining through the post-mining period. <br />Quality data included for MW65 begins in 1984 when the well was established TDS values are higher <br />during 1984 through 1986, then stay in a reasonably close range during mining and after operations <br />ceased. Similarly, some iron levels were higher during the period 1984 through 1988 than the <br />remainder of mining operations, then have declined after 2000. Manganese values increased from 1984 <br />through 1988, then remained stable during mining, and have decreased after mining ceased in 2000. <br />Data included for the remaining parameters show that concentrations have remained in a reasonably <br />close range as monitored during and after mining operations. <br />Review of all groundwater monitoring data shows that no significant adverse quality trends have <br />developed at any of the three monitoring wells. From these results we believe that there does not appear <br />to be any decrease in coal seam groundwater quality resulting from the Southfield mining operation as <br />compared to coal seam groundwater quality prior to mining operations. <br />2. Full data set of surface water flow measurements <br />Accompanying submittal of the IR43 Application, EFCI provided stream flow data from 2000 through <br />2013. Included with this submittal is a table showing all streamflow measurements beginning in 1985, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.