My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2015-02-26_REPORT - C1981028 (7)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Coal
>
C1981028
>
2015-02-26_REPORT - C1981028 (7)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/29/2017 10:35:21 AM
Creation date
2/26/2015 12:52:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981028
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
2/26/2015
Doc Name
Annual Hydrology and Reclamation Report
From
Coors Energy Company
To
DRMS
Annual Report Year
2014
Permit Index Doc Type
Annual Reclamation Report
Email Name
TNL
DIH
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
178
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Keenesburg Mine 2014 Vegetation Monitoring Report <br />1 INTRODUCTION <br />Coors Energy Company (CEC) operated the Keenesburg Mine for coal extraction from 1980 to <br />1988 and is now conducting reclamation activities under Colorado Division of Reclamation <br />Mining and Safety (DRMS) Mining and Reclamation Permit C- 1981 -028. Vegetation monitoring <br />of reclaimed areas is required by DRMS. This report presents the results of annual reclamation <br />monitoring conducted on August 12 and 13, 2014 by Habitat Management, Inc. Quantitative <br />information in this report addresses the vegetative condition of Reclamation Areas 30 and 31. <br />Vegetation sampling was performed in compliance with Colorado Mined Land Reclamation <br />Board Surface Coal Mining Rules 2.04.10 and 4.15 and currently accepted methods for <br />vegetation sampling. <br />The Keenesburg Mine is located in Weld County, Colorado, approximately seven miles north of <br />the town of Keenesburg and is accessed by Weld County Road 59. In 2002, the Keenesburg <br />Mine assigned numerical designations to each reclamation area starting in the northeast corner of <br />the permit area and continuing clockwise through the reclaimed areas (Figure 1). Newly <br />reclaimed areas are assigned consecutive numbers as needed. Reclamation Areas 30 and 31 were <br />monitored in 2014. Reclamation Area 30 is 9.68 acres and was revegetated in 2006 and <br />Reclamation Area 31 is 11.92 acres revegetated in 2009. Reclamation activities included <br />backfilling, grading, topsoiling, and revegetation in accordance with CEC's approved DRMS <br />reclamation plan. <br />2 METHODS <br />The revegetation standards used to evaluate these areas are those currently in effect under the <br />Colorado Surface Coal Mining Reclamation Act (CRS 34 -33 -101) .and the Keenesburg Mining <br />and Reclamation Permit. <br />2.1 Sampling Design <br />Ten vegetation cover samples and 15 herbaceous production samples was collected from each <br />Reclamation Area. These quantities were consistent with past sampling and methodology <br />agreements between CEC and DRMS. The Keenesburg Mine does not have a requirement to <br />meet sample adequacy; however, minimum sample sizes and standard deviations are reported as <br />an indication of variability of the sampled parameters. In all cases, comparisons presented in this <br />report assume that the sample mean value of each parameter accurately represents the population <br />mean. <br />Sample points were located prior to going into the field using mapping software to create a <br />square grid overlaid on each area being sampled. A sample point is located at the intersection of <br />each square created by the grid. The grid size was adjusted to create a total of 15 sample <br />locations within each Reclamation Area. To minimize edge effects and transition zones, those <br />sample points with grid squares falling on the boundary of the Reclamation Area with more than <br />50% of their area outside the boundary, or whose centroid falls outside of the boundary were <br />excluded. Sample point numbers (1 -15) were randomly assigned to the locations using a random <br />number generator. The points labelled 1 -10 designated locations for both cover and production <br />sampling and points 11 -15 designated locations for production sampling only. Azimuths were <br />also assigned to each sample location using a random number generator. Sample points were <br />located in the field using a sub -meter GIS grade GPS unit. <br />Habitat Management, Inc. 2 September 2014 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.