2015-02-25_REVISION - C1992080

• Permit No: C1992080
• IBM Index Class Name: Revision
• Doc Date: 2/25/2015
• Doc Name: 2nd Adequacy Review
• From: DRMS
• To: Oakridge Energy, Inc
• Type & Sequence: PR1
• Email Name: MLT
• Email Name: DIH
• Media Type: D
• Archive: No

Oakridge Energy, Inc.25-Feb-2015
C-1992-080 / PR-01 / AdeqReview#2Page 5of 6
DRMS 02/25This item has been
: Figure 1 wasincorporated, as requested.
satisfactorily addressed.
DRMS 12/08
2.:In section 2.2.2 of Appendix 5-14, it states that no transects were allowed
to extend within 10 feet of the reference area boundary. Using the scale provided on the
2014 Reference Area Sample Points photo, two points fall within 10 feet of the perimeter.
One of the two points is in the SE corner along the southern border and the other is on the
eastern border, second from the north. Please clarify if these points were used in the data
set.
DRMS 02/25
: The statement regarding transects and the reference area boundary was
This item has been satisfactorily addressed.
deleted from the text.
DRMS 12/08
3.:The first hit data points were provided and are listed in Table 2 of
Appendix. Using this data, the total vegetative covers values were verified. The data for
the quantitative cover was not provided in the dataset and therefore could not be verified.
Please provide the additional interceptions data for verification of data analysis.
DRMS 02/25
: Secondary and subsequent vegetation cover hits were incorporated into
This item has been satisfactorily addressed.
Table 2.
DRMS 12/08
4.:All the data points in the data set of Table 2 are even numbers. Please
include an explanation as to why all the data points are even numbers.
DRMS 02/25This item has been
: An explanation has been provided in the text.
satisfactorily addressed.
DRMS 12/08
5.:Bromus japonicus in Table 2 has Downy brome listed as its common
name. The common name for Bromus japonicus is Japanese brome and Downy brome is
the common name for Bromus tectorum. Please clarify which species was observed.
DRMS 02/25
:The text was revised to reflect that Bromus japonicas(Japanese brome)
This item has been satisfactorily addressed.
was thespeciessampled.
DRMS 12/08
6.:Table 2 has numerous mathematical errors or inconsistencies. Two
examples, but not all, are listed below. Please review all the data in Table 2 and re-
submit.
a.The data set for graminoids is calculated differently than that of forbs and shrubs.
As an example, Agropyron intermediumis listed as having 2 hits in the data set
and is calculated as having an overall mean of .10 and relative cover of .60.
Heterotheca villosaand Artemisia tridentatewere also recorded as having 2 hits
but the overall mean is .08 and overall relative cover is .60.
b.The total of the overall mean column is 21.62 which does not equal the mean of
the vegetation cover row of 24.5.
DRMS 02/25This item has been
:Formulaeinthespreadsheet werecorrected.
satisfactorily addressed.