Laserfiche WebLink
January 27, 2015C-1992-080/Carbon Junction MineMLT <br />HYDROLOGIC BALANCE -Rule 4.05 <br />Drainage Control 4.05.1, 4.05.2, 4.05.3; Siltation Structures 4.05.5, 4.05.6; Discharge Structures <br />4.05.7,4.05.10; Diversions 4.05.4; Effluent Limits 4.05.2; Ground Water Monitoring 4.05.13; <br />Surface Water Monitoring 4.05.13; Drainage –Acid and Toxic Materials 4.05.8; Impoundments <br />4.05.6, 4.05.9; Stream Buffer Zones 4.05.18: <br />Repairs made to the riprap in the Carbon Junction Channel permanent diversion and the <br />Unnamed Tributary (Photo 2) appear to have been successful. <br />The twin culvert pipes that carry the permanent diversion beneath the paved road were <br />inspected. The inlets (Photo 3) and outlets were found tobe clear. <br />We observed one location in the downstream half of the permanent diversion, adjacent to the <br />paved haul road, where a buildup of sediment may need to be removed in order to maintain <br />the capacity of the channel (Photo 4). <br />We detected the odor of HS, Hydrogen sulfide, in the area between the reclaimed South Pit <br />2 <br />(now part of the gravel permit area) and the two-track road that circles the south side of the <br />Previously Reclaimed Spoils Area (PRSA). It smelled like a geothermal spring, althoughno <br />evidence of such a feature wasobserved. <br />BACKFILL and GRADING –Rule 4.14 <br />Contemporaneous Reclamation 4.14.1; Approximate Original Contour 4.14.2; Highwall <br />Elimination 4.14.1(2)(f); Steep Slopes 4.14.2, 4.27; Handling of Acid and Toxic Materials <br />4.14.3; Stabilization of Rills and Gullies 4.14.6: <br />All disturbed areas have been previously backfilled and graded, and the operator has received <br />full Phase I and Phase II bond release. <br />Two wells, 82-4 and 95-1, are proposed to be retained as permanent features. Well permits <br />for these installations have been issued by the State Engineer’s Office. <br />RECLAMATION SUCCESS -Rule 4.15, Rule 3: <br />The footprint of former Topsoil Stockpile #2 was inspected, and found to tie in reasonably <br />well with the surrounding terrain. Nonoxious species were found to be growing, although <br />much of the footprint was covered with a few inches of snow. <br />REVEGETATION –Rule 4.15 <br />Vegetative Cover; Timing: <br />Small areas of the permit, such as the outslopenear the south end of the paved road, were <br />disturbed to repair erosion that occurred in September 2014. These areas should be reseeded <br />if that was not done at the time of the repairs. <br />Thistle rosettes were noticeable in certain areas of the reclamation. The heaviest <br />concentration exists on the north-facing slope of the Upper Carbon Junction Channel, <br />regraded and seeded in November 2013. Canada thistle was identified previously amongst <br />the willows in former Pond 2, and a few Musk rosettes are scattered on the reclaimed North <br />Pit slopes. <br />Number of PartialInspection this Fiscal Year: 3 <br />37 <br />Number of CompleteInspections this Fiscal Year: 3Page of <br />