My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2014-11-20_PERMIT FILE - M2014054 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2014054
>
2014-11-20_PERMIT FILE - M2014054 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:55:30 PM
Creation date
1/13/2015 9:39:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2014054
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
11/20/2014
Doc Name
Adequacy Review Response No. 1
From
DRMS
To
Travis Anderson/Amanda Adkins
Email Name
MAC
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
41\ D N R COLORAD O <br /> co <br /> Division of Reclamation, RECEIVED <br /> Mining and Safety <br /> Department of Natural Resources <br /> 1313 Sherman Street,Room 215 DEC 18 ?014 <br /> Denver,CO 80203 DIVISION OF RECLAMATION <br /> MINING AND SAFETY <br /> November 20,2014 <br /> Travis Anderson <br /> Amanda Adkins <br /> P.O.Box 31268 <br /> Colorado Springs, CO 80911 <br /> RE: The Rise Above; DRMS File No.M-2014-054•,Preliminary Adequacy Review <br /> Dear Mr. Anderson and Ms. Adkins, <br /> The Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety has completed its preliminary adequacy review <br /> of your Limited Impact Operation 110(2)Reclamation Permit Amendment Application. The <br /> application was received on September 30,2014 and called complete for review on November <br /> 14, 2014. The decision date for this application is December 14,2014. Please be advised that if <br /> you are unable to satisfactorily address any concerns identified in this review before the <br /> decision date, it will be your responsibility to request an extension of the review period. If there <br /> are outstanding issues that have not been adequately addressed prior to the end of the review <br /> period, and no extension has been requested, the Division will deny this application. <br /> The review consisted of comparing the application content with specific requirements of Rule <br /> 6.1, 6.2, 6.3, and 6.5 of the Mineral Rules and Regulations of the Colorado Mined Land <br /> Reclamation Board for Hard Rock, Metal and Designated Mining Operations. In general the <br /> application was substantially adequate, however, as with most applications there are a few items <br /> that will require the submittal of additional information or clarification of the existing <br /> information. Inadequacies are identified under the respective exhibit heading along with <br /> suggested actions to correct them. <br /> 6.3.1 Exhibit A-Legal Description and Location Map <br /> No comment. <br /> 6.3.2 Exhibit B-Site Description <br /> No comment. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.