Laserfiche WebLink
June 2000 4 <br />Energy Fuels Coal, Inc. 1999 Annual Hydrology Report <br />QUARTERLY HYDROLOGY MONITORING PROGRAM <br />DATA SUMMARY <br />(Period January 1, 1999 through December 31, 1999) <br />Lr <br />1i� • <br />This section of the 1999 AHR presents all surface and ground water data collected at the <br />Southfield Mine from 1979 through the end of the reporting period. Discussion of these data, <br />including potential impacts and trends, follows below. <br />Surface Water <br />Field and laboratory data collected from approved monitoring points on Newlin, Oak, Magpie <br />and Second Alkali Creeks are shown on water quality Tables 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, and <br />17. Stream flow measurements for these monitoring locations are summarized on Table 9. <br />Monitoring of upstream and downstream locations on Newlin, Magpie and Oak Creeks was <br />continued during the reporting period. EFCI voluntarily began monitoring two locations on <br />the referenced creeks during the second quarter of 1997. Data from the additional monitoring <br />is included in the stream quality and quantity data summary tables. In addition, EFCI no <br />longer includes data from the Newlin Creek monitoring point prior to second quarter of 1997 <br />since the single monitoring location was located between the two current monitoring points. <br />Data from the original Newlin Creek monitoring point (NC -1) is included in prior AHR's. <br />Stream flows occurred during the spring months in response to precipitation events during the <br />reporting period. Measurable flows were monitored in all the streams. All monitored creeks <br />flowed during the 2nd quarter due to heavy rains received during early Spring. In Oak Creek, <br />flows persisted during the entire reporting period. Similar to previous reporting periods, <br />Second Alkali Creek exhibited infrequent, low flow patterns in response to precipitation <br />events. <br />Review of the accompanying water quality data indicate no unusual or harmful trends. Data <br />for Oak Creek monitoring indicate slightly increasing levels of TDS, conductivity, sodium <br />and sulfate downstream as compared to the upstream location. All other parameters were <br />similar for the upstream and downstream monitoring locations. <br />The data for Newlin Creek show no significant changes from the upstream and downstream <br />monitoring locations, and are comparable to ranges found in previous monitoring periods. No <br />deterioration of Newlin Creek or Oak Creek resulting from mining is apparent from the water <br />quality data collected to date. <br />