Laserfiche WebLink
Brock Bowles <br />Page 8of8 <br />December 12, 2014 <br />Rule 4.05.9(13): NA — None of the three sedimentation ponds is proposed to be retained as a <br />permanent impoundment. <br />Rule 4.05.9(14) and (15): WFC has completed the inspection required at the time of completion of <br />construction of Pond NHN -001, and a copy of the inspection report was submitted to the Division. <br />Rule 4.05.9(16): NA — WFC is not currently proposing to enlarge, reduce, reconstruct or otherwise <br />modify the proposed sedimentation ponds. <br />Rule 4.05.9(17): To date, WFC has conducted quarterly inspections of Pond NHN -001 for the <br />appearance of structural weakness or other hazardous conditions. Copies of the reports have been <br />submitted to the Division as required. <br />Rule 4.05.9(18): NA — WFC has not requested that the Division waive the requirements of Rule <br />4.05.9(17). <br />Rule 4.05.9(19): NA — Quarterly inspections submitted by WFC have not identified any hazards <br />requiring remediation. <br />Rule 4.05.13(2): WFC has reported no discharge from Pond NHN -001 since it was constructed. <br />Copies of CDPS discharge monitoring forms (reporting there has been no discharge) have been <br />submitted to the Division on a quarterly basis. <br />This concludes my review comments. The updated reclamation cost estimate for the operation is <br />attached. <br />Should you or the operator have any questions, please let me know. <br />