My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2014-12-10_INSPECTION - C1981022
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Inspection
>
Coal
>
C1981022
>
2014-12-10_INSPECTION - C1981022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/20/2016 10:21:16 AM
Creation date
12/11/2014 8:32:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981022
IBM Index Class Name
Inspection
Doc Date
12/10/2014
Doc Name
Inspection Report
From
DRMS
To
Oxbow Mining
Inspection Date
10/28/2014
Email Name
JRS
MPB
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
October 28, 2014 C- 1981 - 022 /Elk Creek Mine JRS <br />place straw bales in the breached area (for sediment control). They will then need to construct a small ditch and <br />breach the topsoil stockpile to allow the water to drain out and continue to drain. (Note: On 4 December 2014 the <br />operator provided photographic documentation that the work at the topsoil stockpile had been completed.) <br />- Although not specifically measured, the GVB pad and road sizes and locations for longwall panels 18 and 19 <br />have been noted in several previous inspection reports. It was apparent in the field that the majority of the drill <br />pads were larger than the 150'x150', which is the permitted size. Besides pad and road areas being larger than <br />permitted (per Exhibit 2.04 -E3, Item 9), in many cases they were constructed in the wrong locations (per Drawing <br />2.05 -M1, Sheet 6 of 6). This information has been provided to the operator previously and, if necessary, another <br />copy of this information can be sent. The overall increase in disturbance due to larger pads and roads is <br />approximately 28.6 acres. This discrepancy will need to be fixed in the appropriate exhibit, on the appropriate <br />map and accounted for in the reclamation cost estimate. The appropriate method for this correction will be <br />through the submittal and approval of a technical revision. <br />DOCUMENTS RECEIVED: None <br />This concludes the 28 -29 October 2014 partial /OSM Special Focus inspection report for the Elk Creek mine. <br />Number of Partial Inspection this Fiscal Year: 3 <br />Number of Complete Inspections this Fiscal Year: 1 <br />Page 7 of 34 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.