My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2014-11-25_REVISION - M1979191 (30)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1979191
>
2014-11-25_REVISION - M1979191 (30)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 2:30:18 PM
Creation date
11/28/2014 11:47:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1979191
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
11/25/2014
Doc Name
Geotechnical Stability Analysis
From
GEI
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM1
Email Name
ECS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 3 <br />November 3, 2014 <br />• 2 residential farming structures <br />Owner: Cache la Poudre Irrigation Company <br />• Weir on the Greeley Number 2 Canal <br />Owner: Poudre Valley REA <br />• Power lines /power line poles <br />Stability Analyses <br />Mr. Eric Scott <br />Colorado DRMS <br />Stability analyses were performed in order to evaluate potential for damage to existing <br />permanent structures due to mine highwall slope failures. Analyses were performed with <br />Slope/W 2012 v. 8.12.3.7901 computer program. For each case we analyzed the most <br />critical soil profiles based on exploratory boring data (i.e. tallest highwall, shortest highwall <br />ledge, thickest overburden, etc.). <br />The stability analyses were run in accordance with accepted geotechnical standards and <br />DRMS requirements for temporary pit slopes summarized as follows: <br />• Mine highwalls were modeled as vertical slopes <br />• Residual soil strength parameters used for the upper 2.5 feet of weathered bedrock <br />• Factor of Safety must be greater than 1.0 <br />Groundwater levels on the profiles were modeled with anticipated maximum elevations to <br />portray anticipated site conditions. <br />Laboratory strength tests were not performed on soils from the site. The soil strength <br />parameters used were based on typical values from the anticipated soils and our experience <br />working with DRMS at other sites. The input strength parameters are displayed in Table 1. <br />Table 1. Stability Analysis Strength Parameters <br />Material <br />Unit Weight <br />(pct) <br />Effective <br />Cohesion <br />Effective Friction <br />Angle (deg) <br />Sand and gravel <br />125 <br />0 <br />35 <br />Overburden <br />122 <br />0 <br />27 <br />Shale Bedrock <br />120 <br />100 <br />30 <br />GE <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.