My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2014-11-21_PERMIT FILE - C1996084 (23)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1996084
>
2014-11-21_PERMIT FILE - C1996084 (23)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:55:33 PM
Creation date
11/24/2014 11:00:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1996084
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
11/21/2014
Section_Exhibit Name
SECTION 2.04 INFORMATION ON ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
63
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• Rule 2.' Permits <br />communities. These are well drained soils with slow to moderately rapid permeability. The water <br />erosion hazard is very high, and the wind erosion hazard is slight to high. <br />A typical profile includes a surface layer with 4 to 6 inches of very channery clay loam, channery <br />silty clay loam or sandy loam. The subsoil, where present, consists of 32 inches of channery silty <br />clay loam. The substratum, where present, is 9 to 12 inches of clay loam, clay, and/or sandy <br />loam. Depth to bedrock is from 14 to 38 inches. <br />Soils Analysis <br />Samples collected from 14 representative pits during the July 1996 investigations were analyzed <br />for the following physical and chemical characteristics: texture (by hydrometer), saturation <br />percentage, sodium adsorption ratio, pH, electrical conductivity, organic matter, calcium, <br />magnesium, sodium, boron, and selenium. Results are presented in Exhibit 9. Lab results of <br />texture analyses were used to adjust textures originally estimated in the field using visual and <br />tactile means. <br />The lab results were compared with topsoil and overburden suitability guidelines for Wyoming <br />and Montana. These guidelines are generally applicable to Colorado which has no state suitability <br />guidelines. There appear to be few chemical limitations for salvage and use of project area soils <br />• for reclamation. The pH for all samples ranged from 5.9 to 8.0, which is well within the <br />acceptable range (5.5 to 8.5). The highest specific conductivity reading was 3.42 mmhos/cm <br />which is below the level of concern (4.00). The highest SAR (sodium adsorption ratio) measured <br />was 7.2 (values less than 10 are generally suitable). Soluble selenium levels were all 0.06 ppm <br />or less, well below the 0.1 ppm level of concern. All samples had boron levels below 5 except <br />one (113-A had a soluble boron level of 5.00 ppm). Levels of 5 or greater are considered <br />unsuitable by both Montana and Wyoming. <br />Suitability of Soil Horizons as Plant Growth Media <br />The permit area contains deep soils in the Lorencito and Cow creek valleys. These soils generally <br />have favorable textures for reclamation. Upland soils are a mixture of unusable shallow, <br />excessively stony or cobbly soils as well as relatively deep soils with favorable textures for <br />reclamation. <br />Shawa Loam, 5 to 15 percent slopes (map symbol CeD) has 36 to 60 inches of salvageable soil. <br />The texture is generally clay loam or sandy clay loam. In some areas, a very gravelly content <br />below 36 inches will limit salvage depth. <br /> <br />PERMIT.a'IS~December 20, 1996 2.04-42 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.