My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2014-11-14_PERMIT FILE - M2014043 (3)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2014043
>
2014-11-14_PERMIT FILE - M2014043 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:55:23 PM
Creation date
11/19/2014 10:13:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2014043
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
11/14/2014
Doc Name
Adequacy Review 01
From
Environment, Inc.
To
DRMS
Email Name
TOD
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ENVIRONMENT, INC. <br />NOVEMBER 14, 2014 <br />PAGE 2 <br />perimeter in Phase 2. As mining approaches the perimeter of the mine a 25 foot mining <br />setback will be staked from the permit line to establish the mining limit. An additional safety <br />setback of 25 feet will be staked from the mining setback line to establish the limit, where <br />mining with a near vertical face will stop. In the Geotechnical Analysis we show that by using <br />the setback proposed in this text the safety factor for the closest structure will be 1.52, so by <br />reason, as you move away from the mine face the greater the safety factor would be for any <br />structures within 200 feet of the permit line. <br />4) The mining plan states that mining slopes near adjacent structures will not exceed 3H:1 V during <br />mining; however, the mining plan map C -1 shows slopes of phase 1 steeper than 3H: I V. Please describe <br />in more detail the pit slopes of mining phase 1 during mining operations and use as a recycled water pond <br />for the wash plant. Will the western and southern pit slopes of mining phase 1 be mined at a 3H:1 V <br />slope? <br />Here again the plan is to have the mining face worked at a near vertical slope as mining <br />progresses thru the area. Albert Frei & Sons, Inc. has decided to not mine within 200 feet of <br />the Thornton Reservoir complex slurry wall /dam. This new setback is shown on the following <br />revised Map Exhibits; C -1 - Mining Plan Map, F - Reclamation Plan Mip, Figure E -2 and <br />Figure E -3. Please see the attached Geotechnical Analysis prepared by Deere and Ault <br />Consultants for the Thornton structures. Along the south side the mining setback will be 25 <br />feet but that slope will be mined 2:1 or flatter then the natural angle of repose. <br />5) The mining plan states the applicant plans to mine pit slopes at a 3H:1 V slope near adjacent structures. <br />Please illustrate on the Mining Plan Map which slopes will be mined at a 3H:1 V slope. <br />As noted above the plan is to leave a safety buffer around the mine if the 1/2:1 slopes proves <br />to be prone to failure. This 25 foot safety buffer is shown on the north .and south sides of <br />Phase 2 on the revised Map Exhibit C -1 - Mining Plan Map. In addition, no mining will take <br />place within 200 feet of the Thornton structures. <br />6.4.4 EXHIBIT D - Mining Plan <br />6) Please describe the nature of the stratum immediately beneath the material to be mined. <br />According to the USGS Geologic maps for this area the material underlying the gravel to be <br />mined is a part of the Denver Formation. It is a dense grey shale, silty claystone and <br />interbedded siltstone formation of the Upper Cretaceous age that is from 800 to 1000 feet <br />thick. <br />7) Please specify if explosives will be used in conjunction with the mining or reclamation <br />operations. <br />Explosives will not be used during mining or reclamation at this sand and gravel mine. <br />8) Please commit to salvaging enough growth medium to spread 8 inches over all of the affected lands. <br />Albert Frei & Sons agrees to salvage enough growth medium to resoil--the affected lands with <br />a minimum of 8 inches average. <br />9) The installation of the slurry wall around the Hatchery Pit would direct groundwater flow between the <br />pit and the lined reservoir to the west. DRMS believes the applicant may reduce the cross sectional area <br />of the alluvial groundwater flow between the reservoir to the west and the shale by as much as 80 %. <br />DRMS believes the installation of the slurry wall around the Hatchery Pit would further constrict the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.