My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2014-10-10_PERMIT FILE - C1996083 (8)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1996083
>
2014-10-10_PERMIT FILE - C1996083 (8)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:48:46 PM
Creation date
11/18/2014 12:47:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1996083
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
10/10/2014
Section_Exhibit Name
Volume IIIA Exhibit 15 Subsidence Prediction
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
He concludes that, <br />"Differential movement on the fault plane can be caused by the first workings <br />near the fault. If the coal is only taken from one side of the fault the angle of <br />draw can be greatly reduced, but with workings in more than one position the <br />normal angle of draw is likely to be observed. Once differential movement <br />has occurred, further workings in the area cause renewed movement which <br />is sometimes out of all proportion to the thickness and extent of the <br />extraction. The likelihood of movement is not influenced by the depth of the <br />seam but mainly by the position of the face." <br />He also observed that when the coal is mined out close to the fault at mine level, the <br />step on the surface will extend over the full width and not far past the extracted area. And <br />the prediction of the step height should only be done when the workings are underneath <br />the fault plane and on the upthrow side of the fault. <br />From this analysis it could be postulated that in the Bowie #2 Mine, regardless of the <br />depth, when a fault is encountered and coal is mined beneath the fault plane on the <br />upthrow side of the fault a step on the surface could result with a maximum height of <br />approximately (0.33) X 4.9'= 1.6' extending over and slightly past the retreated room and <br />pillar workings. One could also speculate that the rate of subsidence would be accelerated <br />due to the increased vertical pillar strain on development pillars. <br />The First North Mains mined into the fault in late 1997 or early 1998. The fault is <br />characterized as a shear fault as opposed to a roll fault and little or no goaf was <br />encountered. The fault trace was virtually dry. <br />The rock entries and raises should be supported to assure any debris within the fault <br />plane is supported in place and not allowed to cave or flow into the mine. Roof support <br />may include additional bolting, steel sets, steel sets with lagging and fill above the steel <br />sets to assure fault debris is supported and contained. <br />1.9 LONG TERM PILLAR STABILITY <br />The long term stability of the pillars in the bleeder entries in the Bowie No. 2 Mine was <br />evaluated using the Salamon and Munro pillar strength equation. To assure long term <br />PR -14 -20- 03/14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.