Laserfiche WebLink
On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 11:25 AM, Linda Saunders <saunders615 1ive.com> wrote: <br />Two things are the reason for my question and I would appreciate clarification. <br />1. On July 1,2013 Letter from Janet Binns to answer my questions I asked if Janet and Jason had located any <br />of the drill holes on the Vento property. On page 5 in her response she says "Water monitoring boreholes in <br />the approved water monitoring plan should not be sealed prior to Division approval." Was there water in them? <br />2. Drill hole SF 87 -07 near MWNW had water in it last year. Could MWNW have water in it and EFCI could not <br />get to it to test if there is a 2X4X8inch piece of wood blocking it? <br />Please provide answers. <br />Linda <br />Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2014 10:05:21 -0600 <br />Subject: Re: Status of Water monitoring boreholes <br />From: rob.zuber@state.co.us <br />To: saunders6l5@live.com <br />Linda - <br />do not believe that the function of the boreholes was for hydrology but rather to characterize the geology in <br />the context of coal exploration. Please point me to something in the permit if you disagree. <br />Thanks, <br />Rob <br />.b Z <br />Environmental Protection ; a <br />Coat Regulatory Pr! L <br />[.)e partm nr of IVahirral Resources <br />P 303.866.3567, extension 8113 I F 303.832.8106 <br />1313 Sherman Street, Room 215, Denver, CO 80203 <br />rob.zuberCstate.co.us I http: / /mining.state.co.us <br />On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 8:02 PM, Linda Saunders <saunders615@Iive.com> wrote: <br />Since they were water monitoring boreholes, do they see if there is water in them. <br />know they are not wells. <br />Linda <br />Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2014 14:42:48 -0600 <br />Subject: Re: Status of Water monitoring boreholes <br />From: rob. zuber state.co.us <br />To: saunders6l5@live.com <br />https: / /mail.googl e.com /m ai I /u/0 / ?ui =2 &i k= e29129fcb5 &view =pt &search= i nbox &th= 149bf8abO5c2e640 &si m l= 149bf8abO5c2e640 2/5 <br />