Laserfiche WebLink
Tom Bird, GCC Energy, LLC <br />C- 1981 -035 / TR -20 / AR #2 <br />14- Nov -2014 <br />Page 5 of 7 <br />above. (Generally, compaction tests are conducted at least quarterly, if any material is <br />placed in a given quarter, and the results are included with the quarterly report required by <br />4.10.2.) <br />h) Section 2.05.4 of the permit refers to the Trautner report for determination of cover <br />material. Subsection 6.7 of Trautner addresses placement of cover material, and refers the <br />reader to the Appendix C (by CDS Environmental) of the report. Page 5 of the CDS report <br />(Appendix C) recommends the following: apply 6 -8 inches of a high clay soil to the final <br />surface of the waste bank, and roto -till 15 -18 inches deep. Then, apply a 24 inch top soil cap <br />suitable for plant growth. For the Refuse Pile, the permit requires 3.5 feet of "cover ", topped <br />with 6 inches of "plant growth medium ". <br />i) Does GCC wish to utilize a different reclamation and cover strategy (i.e. the CDS plan) <br />for the West Waste Bank than that which is currently permitted for the Refuse Pile, per <br />Rule 4.10.4(5)? <br />Based on GCC's 06- Oct -2014 response, the answer to this question appears to be, <br />"Yes ". This item is resolved. <br />ii) The permit text should be revised to include the cover requirements for the West <br />Waste Bank just as it does for the Refuse Pile. <br />Section 2.05.4 was revised as requested. This item is resolved. <br />7.0 Slope Stability Analysis <br />a) With the 14- Aug -2012 report, Trautner evaluated waste bank heights of 10 and 20 feet, and <br />outslopes of 2h:1v, 2.5h:1v, and 3h:1v. All of the analyses produced a factor of safety (FOS) <br />which exceeded the minimum static FOS of 1.5 required by Rule 4.10.4(2). The report did <br />recommend that slopes of 2h:1v should be avoided, due to construction limitations. <br />b) With the February 2013 submittal, a new stability analysis from Trautner (dated 12 -Feb- <br />2013) was provided which utilized the specific dimensions now proposed for the West Waste <br />Bank. This analysis considered a pile height of 30 feet with a face constructed at 2.5h:1v. <br />The result is a predicted FOS of 1.69, which exceeds the required minimum of 1.5. <br />c) (New) GCC's 06- Oct -2014 submittal included a Revised study by Trautner, dated 30 -Sep- <br />2014. The Slope Stability Analysis fails to incorporate the configuration evaluated by <br />Trautner in Feb -2013, i.e. the pile height of 30 feet, with a 2.5:1 face. Now that the <br />Trautner study has been updated, it does not make sense to omit the proposed design from <br />the Stability Analysis. Please update the Revised study to include the proposed design <br />configuration of the West Waste Bank. <br />Permit Maps <br />1. Map King 1 -007 Operation Plan & Surface Features <br />a) Please identify on this map the various features discussed in the permit text, specifically the <br />Fan Bench, the Tipple Bench, and the Shop Bench. The location of the proposed West Waste <br />Bank is identified as a "Coal Storage Area" on this map. Please clarify in the maps and text <br />