My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2014-10-21_REVISION - M1988044 (5)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1988044
>
2014-10-21_REVISION - M1988044 (5)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/16/2021 6:27:05 PM
Creation date
10/22/2014 7:14:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1988044
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
10/21/2014
Doc Name
TR Submittal
From
Mark A. Heifner for Schmidt Construction Company
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
TR7
Email Name
TAK
TOD
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
79
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
TR-07 MINING PLAN <br /> Exhibits C-3 through C-7: Please refer to the original maps in the permit for soils, vegetation, <br /> wildlife, wetlands and weeds. <br /> Nature of the Sand Deposits <br /> The sand deposits to be mined at this operation are derived primarily from alluvial deposits,but <br /> also contain significant amounts of aeolian sand. Sand deposited in the past by streams was also subject to <br /> blowing and at various times in the distant past small dunes appear to have been present on portions of this <br /> land. During the prolonged drought of the xerothermic period (about 5,000 years ago), it is likely that <br /> vegetation was sparse and perhaps the landscape looked more like the Sahara or Gobi deserts do today. <br /> The sand can occur in what appear to be poorly defined patches or pockets. In fact, these pockets <br /> may have more unity than appears to be the case,but the pattern cannot be determined from surface <br /> indications. These deposits were created mainly by alluvial processes and probably by Coal Creek when it <br /> flowed across old erosion surfaces that are higher than the current stream course. It is likely that the stream <br /> exhibited considerable meandering and therefore the sand deposit would exhibit various degrees of <br /> meandering as well. But determining where the stream flowed at any particular point in time, which would <br /> correspond to an elevation, is virtually impossible without excavating everything in thin, horizontal slices. <br /> Furthermore, this pattern may have been broken by old drainages and tributary erosion that may have been <br /> subsequently filled. As a result, the sand deposit today follows a pattern that is best described as a <br /> patchwork of intermittent deposits that may be associated with an underlying, but unidentifiable specific <br /> pattern. In short, the sand is where you find it. This pattern is so mixed that during the exploration, <br /> locations where sand was expected did not show any or very little sand and places where sand would not <br /> be expected had excellent sand. Surface indicators were rarely found to be reliable. <br /> From a mining point of view this is problematic. Because of the patchy character of the sand <br /> deposit, developing a precise mining plan and showing exactly where and how mining will be conducted <br /> at any time or place is essentially impossible. As has been done in the past, the mining starts where it is <br /> known sand exists, from exploration information. The mining must then spread out from there and simply <br /> follow the deposit wherever it goes. When that pocket, which may be small or large, runs out then another <br /> pocket must be opened and the depleted pocket reclaimed. <br /> Permit Boundary vs. Affected Land Boundary vs. Bonding Boundary <br /> Permit Boundary Definition: The Permit Boundary described in Exhibit A is defined by and <br /> derived from the lease (GL-264) issued by the Colorado State Board of Land Commissioners. The permit <br /> includes all land included in the lease, with the exception of oil and gas facilities that have been <br /> specifically excluded. Thus, the permit area will always be less than the lease area. The permit area is <br /> mapped acreage rather than idealized section areas as in the lease. <br /> Coal Creek Sand Resource Amendment 3 (2005)- M-1988-044 Exhibit D Page 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.