Laserfiche WebLink
Quarterly Inspection Report - Refuse Pile October 9, 2014 <br />Twentymile Coal Company- Foidel Creel: Mine Page 2 of 3 <br />Job No.: 99 -3983 <br />scattered sandstone fragments (gravels to small boulders) on the regraded slope. Another load of sandstone <br />fragments had been dumped at the top of the regraded slope, but not placed on the slope. Heavy rain events <br />in July, August and September 2014 have caused the regraded slope materials to erode and flow down to <br />the haul road. Tine washed out materials were not blocking the haul road at the time of our visit. It appears <br />that the drainage from tine top of Areas 2, 3 and 4 is concentrating in this area during heavy rain events, <br />causing the washouts. This concentration of drainage to a small area could lead to possible slope instability <br />if not corrected. Photographs taken of this area in September 2013, June 2014 and September 2014 during <br />our site visits are attached. <br />In addition, several shallow small shallow erosion channels were observed in the refuse materials on the <br />cast, north and west sides of Areas 2, 3 and 4. These erosion channels were likely formed during the heavy <br />rain events in 2013 and have increased in number and size during runoff from slnowmelt in Spring 2014 and <br />additional heavy rain events in July, August and September of 2014. We recommend that these erosion <br />channels be re- graded so that the drainage does not concentrate in these areas and cause further erosion and <br />possible slope instability. <br />NWCC recommends the top of Areas 2, 3 and 4 be regraded to drain to the south, away fi•oin the steep faces <br />of the stockpiled materials, similar to the drainage prior to stopping stockpiling and compaction of the <br />refuse materials when the expansion area was opened. If the regrading of the top of this area is not <br />completed and the drainage is continued to flow toward the drainage port, NWCC recommends a properly <br />designed drainage channel be constructed to handle the flow from heavy runoff on drainage events. The <br />design of the drainage channel should be completed by a qualified Civil Engineer. <br />Based on our observations, the surface drainage conditions, with the exceptions noted above, generally <br />appeared to be adequate across the top and sides of the pile. Based oil our observations, we (lid not observe <br />any signs of instability, structural weakness or hazardous conditions at the refitse pile, with the exceptions <br />noted above. <br />We were advised that the wash plants had produced approximately 130,722 tons of waste coal during the <br />111011th of July 2014, approximately 125,642 tons during August 20t4: and approximately 130,722 tons <br />during September 2014. It is our understanding that the fines being produced at the wash plant, which <br />consists of approximately 10 to 20 percent of the total materials being produced, are being pumped <br />underground into the mine. <br />We were previously informed by Brian Watterson of Peabody that all of the original monitor wells installed <br />in the Refuse Pile were destroyed in July 2012. Two new monitor wells were constructed in Area I of the <br />Refuse Pile in December 2013. NWCC was advised by Mr. Watterson that the water level in the western <br />monitor well (RW# 1) was measured at 61.89 feet below the existing ground surface (bgs) on July 9, at <br />61.87 feet bgs on August 18 and at 61.67 feet oil September 18 of 2014. The water level in the eastern <br />monitor well (RW #2) was measured at 58.01 feet bgs on July 9, at 57.95 feet bgs on August 18 and at 57.89 <br />feet on September IS of 2014. An additional new monitor well (RW #3) was constructed at the southeast <br />end of the I" bench in new Expansion Area in June of 2014. No water was encountered in the coal refuse <br />NIATC, Inc. <br />