My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2014-10-09_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - M1973021
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Minerals
>
M1973021
>
2014-10-09_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - M1973021
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:48:42 PM
Creation date
10/9/2014 1:45:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1973021
IBM Index Class Name
GENERAL DOCUMENTS
Doc Date
10/9/2014
Doc Name
Citizen complaint
From
Thomas N. Scheffel & Associates, P.C.
To
DRMS
Email Name
MAC
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 2 <br />Mr. Michael Cunningham <br />October 7, 2014 <br />As you may know, Colorado law prohibits vehicles from being driven on any highway for <br />a distance of more than two miles if the vehicle is transporting aggregate materials with a <br />diameter of one inch or less unless the load is covered by a tarp or the truck uses some other form <br />of technology that prevents the aggregate material from escaping the vehicle. (C.R.S. § 42 -4- <br />1407) <br />It is my understanding that Aggregate Industries accepts no responsibility for this incident <br />because the uncovered trucks are operated by an independent contractor. Though it is true, as a <br />general rule, that a company is not liable for the acts of its independent contractor, there are any <br />number of exceptions to this general rule. <br />If a company causes or knows of and sanctions an independent contractor's illegal <br />conduct, the employer is liable. The failure of a contractor to follow safety statutes serves as a <br />basis for the imposition of a duty upon an employer to take the mandated safety precautions or <br />face liability for the contractor's failure to do so. Moreover, an employer is liable for the <br />negligence of its independent contractor if the employer had knowledge of the act and ratified it. <br />It is a general principle of independent contractor law that there exists a nondelegable <br />duty of due care when the contractor's work involves a special risk or danger including work that <br />is dangerous in the absence of special precautions. The imposition of a nondelegable duty of <br />safety on a company that hires an independent contractor reflects the policy judgment that certain <br />obligations are of such importance that companies should not be able to escape liability merely <br />by hiring others to perform them. <br />Highway 285 is a busy commuter corridor. Please do not let Aggregate Industries -WCR, <br />Inc. turn a blind eye to the harm it is causing by passing its responsibilities off on a conveniently <br />unidentifiable independent contractor. The risk of harm to the public is much greater than just <br />broken windshields. <br />Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or require any additional <br />information. <br />Very truly yours, <br />S N. SCHEFFEL & ASSOCIATES, P.C. <br />Josep A. Weber <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.