Laserfiche WebLink
Jerry Nettleton, MCM <br />Page 6 <br />October 6, 2014 <br />c. MCM Response: Map 29 has been reviewed and compared with the Pre - Mining <br />Land Use Map (Map 3). Post mining land -use designations have been added to <br />Map 29 which generally reflects restoration of mine disturbance areas to the pre - <br />mining use. It should be noted however, that there may be some ambiguity in the <br />pre- mining use designations, and the designated post- mining use reflect current <br />and anticipated future use for the disturbed and surrounding areas. <br />d. DRMS Response: The mine area disturbance boundary depicted on revised map <br />29a does not encompass the entire mine related disturbance. Similarly, the subset <br />map on revised map 29a depicts the post mine land use designations for the <br />disturbed area to be reclaimed and they do not encompass the entire mine area <br />disturbance. For example, all or portions of the following areas are not <br />encompassed by the mine disturbance area polygon or encompassed by post - <br />mine land use designations polygons: #5 portal area, #5a portal area, certain <br />sedimentation ponds, diversion/collection or mine water ditches, railroad spur, <br />certain access and light duty roads, 100,000 gallon water tank and the <br />surrounding area, and the solid waste disposal area. Please revise map 29a so all <br />the mine related disturbance is encompassed by the polygons used to depict the <br />mine disturbance area and their appropriate post -mine land use. <br />4.05.13 — Surface and Ground Water Monitoring: <br />1) Revised Map 11 does not depict stream water quality monitoring site Y -1 or the North <br />Spring (Lippard Spring No. 1). Please add these features to this map and submit a <br />revised copy. <br />a. MCM Response: The referenced map has been revised and is included with the <br />responses. <br />b. DRMS Response: The North Spring on the revised Map #11 is in a different <br />place than depicted on the currently approved M #11. Please explain this <br />discrepancy. <br />c. MCM Response: Paradigm Shift <br />d. DRMS Response: This item was not addressed, please explain the discrepancy <br />and/or revise the Map #11. <br />Mid -Term #6: Adequacy Review Issues <br />3. Permit page 2.05 -7 contains a discussion of the drilling activities and planned future monitoring of <br />wells 94 -001 and 95 -14. Based on a review of current drill holes and hydrological monitoring sites, <br />