My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2014-09-11_REVISION - M1977036
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1977036
>
2014-09-11_REVISION - M1977036
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 3:13:15 PM
Creation date
9/12/2014 8:46:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977036
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
9/11/2014
Doc Name
112c Permit amendment application adequacy review AM02
From
DRMS
To
GEI Consultants, Inc.
Type & Sequence
AM2
Email Name
PSH
TAK
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
- COLORADO <br />Division of Reclamation, <br />Mining and Safety <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman Street, Room 215 <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />MEMORANDUM <br />To: Peter Hays <br />From: Tim Cazier, P.E. 'R <br />Date: September 11, 2014 <br />Re: Greeley 35th Ave Pit — Permit No. M -1977 -036 / AM -02 <br />Attachments A & C — Groundwater /ModFlow Results, Preliminary <br />Adequacy Review <br />The Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety engineering staff (Division) have reviewed <br />Attachments A & C — Groundwater Monitoring and Mitigation Plan, and MODFlow Results, <br />respectively included in the Amendment 2 (AM -2) application received on July 3, 2014 for the <br />Greeley 35th Ave Pit, and prepared by GEI Consultants. <br />The review consisted of comparing the application content with specific requirements of Rule <br />6.4.7 of the Minerals Rules and Regulations of the Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Board for <br />the Extraction of Construction Materials. Any inadequacies are identified below along with <br />suggested actions to correct them. <br />General Comments <br />1. The Division could not find any discussion of the methods, parameters and assumptions <br />used in the MODFlow analyses. Please provide a discussion supporting the selected <br />methods (e.g., modeling reservoirs as high conductivity cells), assumptions (e.g., all <br />boundary conditions, steady state vs. dynamic model), and parameters (e.g., hydraulic <br />conductivity, annual recharge, etc.). <br />2. This area is subject to significant potential mining related impacts on the groundwater <br />elevation and therefore quantity. The results on Figure 3, Potentiometric Surface Present <br />Conditions predict two to four foot elevation differences across open water (primarily to <br />the north and east of the West Cell, but to some extent on the south side as well). Given <br />1313 Sherman Street, Room 215, Denver, CO 80203 P 303.866.3567 F 303.832.8106 http: / /mining.state.co.us <br />John W. Hickenlooper, Governor I Mike King, Executive Director I Virginia Brannon, Director <br />c�t0 <br />y4, -'s•Yc��'r�d 90 <br />1 876 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.