My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2014-08-11_HYDROLOGY - M1977208
>
Day Forward
>
Hydrology
>
Minerals
>
M1977208
>
2014-08-11_HYDROLOGY - M1977208
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/6/2020 1:55:56 PM
Creation date
8/11/2014 11:18:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977208
IBM Index Class Name
Hydrology
Doc Date
8/11/2014
Doc Name
Second Quarter 2014 Monitoring Data
From
CEMEX
To
DRMS
Permit Index Doc Type
Hydrology Report
Email Name
MAC
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
TR-12 Trigger Parameters <br /> The analytical results CEM-004 and CEM-005 were compared to the target levels identified in TR-12,which represent 90% <br /> of the Average C-Pit Cation-Anion Signature. The TR-12 trigger levels are shown in Table 2 for reference. <br /> Table 2:TR-12 C-Pit Monitoring,Trigger Parameters and Concenetrations <br /> c-anc.cw�-A�wnsf9n,mr.wre,eac Co <br /> ncentration Analyte/Parameter Trigger Concentration <br /> (mg/0 <br /> H 6.5-8.5 <br /> Chloride 1,053 <br /> Sulfate 2,641 <br /> Total Dissolved Solids 501-10,000 or 1.25 times <br /> background <br /> Selenium 0.05 <br /> Pd°sum Ch- <br /> Thallium 0.002 <br /> so4mm su°., <br /> ,00 so o so too <br /> Data Evaluation <br /> As shown on Table 1, results for the monitoring parameters were below/within with the target concentrations except for <br /> chloride and total suspended solids in CEM-005 on May 15, 2014. Figures 2 and 3 are Stiff Plots for CEM-004 and CEM-005, <br /> comparing the monitoring-well cation-anion signature to the average C-Pit concentration that was identified in TR-12. <br /> v IGEM 003'n C-Pt Averay sj <br /> c C P4 Avwages', - <br /> lyre <br /> Orr rwy ,r.,' <br /> cpm.n.ry ran <br /> abum ._. <br /> alc�um CEA1004 Bicarbonate <br /> B�carbonale <br /> (as CaCO3 as CaCO3 <br /> / agneslum Carbora'e <br /> agnes�um Carbonate <br /> ctasmm Chloride otasium Chloride <br /> Sod.um I Sulfate 'um . Bull <br /> a0 60 4o 20 0 20 40 60 eo 1 200 160 160 140 120 too M 60 40 2n [) 20 40 so 80 too 120 140 1e0 1e0 200 <br /> Figure 2:CEM-004(Report against Triggers) May 15,2014 Figure 3:CEM-005(Compliance Well) May 15,2014* <br /> *Note: this data is not considered to be <br /> representative, but is reported here for <br /> completeness. <br /> The following is an evaluation of the second quarter analytical data from Wells CEM-004 and CEM-005: <br /> • CEM-004:As shown in Table 1 and Figure 2,all parameters in alluvial well CEM-004 were within the trigger <br /> concentrations. <br /> • CEM-005: As shown in Table 1 and Figure 3,two parameters from the May 15, 2014 sample collected from CEM-005 are <br /> outside of the compliance triggers:chloride is>1053 mg/I and total dissolved solids(TDS)is greater than 10,000 mg/l. <br /> While the CEM-005 sample results are provided in this quarterly report for information,the CEM-005 data from May and <br /> June 2014 are not considered to be valid or representative due to deviations from standard sampling protocols for <br /> groundwater. <br /> 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.