My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2014-08-06_REVISION - C1981044
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981044
>
2014-08-06_REVISION - C1981044
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:46:31 PM
Creation date
8/6/2014 9:32:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981044
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
8/6/2014
Doc Name
Adequacy Review No. 2
From
DRMS
To
Moffat County Mining, LLC
Type & Sequence
TR36
Email Name
JLE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Jerry Nettleton, MCM <br />Page 6 <br />August 6, 2014 <br />a. MCM Responses to item 1 through 4: Pages 2.05 -1 and 2.05 -2 have been <br />revised to include the previously provided information on seed -mix and proof of <br />compliance. Page 2.05 -4 has been revised to clarify the statement on <br />"grandfathered" rights, and MCM's intent re: potential future mining. Page 2.05- <br />16 has been revised to clarify approvals for postmining retention of roads, and <br />reference both Maps 29 and 29a. All revised materials are included with these <br />responses. <br />b. DRMS Response: <br />i. Item #1 is resolved <br />ii. Item #2 is resolved <br />iii. Item #3 is resolved <br />iv. Item #4. Revised page 2.05 -16 indicates that MCM will provide <br />documentation from the State of their concurrence with permanent <br />retention of these roads. According to this paragraph, the roads intended <br />to be left in place are primarily located on lands owned by MCM or State <br />land but not exclusively. Please revise this statement to indicate the prior <br />to seeking bond release, documentation for road retention required by <br />Rule 4.03.1(1)(f) and 4.03.2(1)(g) will be submitted to the Division and <br />included in the permit through a revision. This will need to include <br />concurrence from any landowner who own land which the intended roads <br />are located. <br />Rule 2.05.4 — Reclamation Plan <br />1) The Reclamation Map (Map 29) is proposed to be revised. The revised map does not <br />include pertinent information that is on the currently approved Map 29. For example, on <br />portions of the affected area, the map does not include; cross sections, adequate post mine <br />contours, post mine land use designations and dates of disturbance. Either add the <br />currently approved information to the revised map or keep the currently approved map <br />and add the proposed revised map to the permit under a different title and designation <br />(Map 29a for example). <br />2) On the currently approved Reclamation Plan Map; Map 29 it is difficult to determine <br />which areas will be reclaimed to the following post mine land uses: Rangeland/Wildlife, <br />Cropland and Pasture Land. On the revised map discussed on the previous item, clearly <br />delineate which portions of the affected area will be reclaimed to the designated post <br />mine land use. <br />3) Revised Page 2.05 -31.2 discusses reclamation of the Utah Tract. The currently approved <br />narrative for this section discusses the post -mine land use and seed mixture to be used for <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.