My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2014-07-22_REVISION - C1981012
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981012
>
2014-07-22_REVISION - C1981012
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:45:59 PM
Creation date
7/31/2014 7:47:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981012
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
7/22/2014
Doc Name
Second Adequacy Review
From
DRMS
To
New Elk Coal Company, LLC
Type & Sequence
TR68
Email Name
LDS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Louis Head, New Elk Coal Company <br />Page 3 <br />July 22, 2014 <br />The average depth of soil to be stripped from the slopes above the refuse is given in the text as 13" <br />The volume of soil to be stripped is thus estimated, based on the area to be stripped (in acres, ac). <br />The volume of soil estimated to be recovered (in loose cubic yards, LCY) is constant at 2,130 <br />LCY /ac. This value assumes a swell factor for the soil of 21.80 %, which is reasonable. <br />The table calculates an estimate of the volume of soil that can be sent to stockpile, and keeps a <br />running estimate of the cumulative topsoil stockpile volume, at the RDA. It shows that, under an <br />idealized production scenario, there is a net surplus of soil from the RDA of 3,939 LCY. <br />The table is supplemented by subsequent text and a summary Topsoil Resource Table, which <br />together allow validation of the reclamation plan and estimation of the worst -case disturbance for <br />bonding calculations. Although the clarity has been vastly improved, the following issues remain: <br />i. The stockpile volumes in Table 24 are in LCY. Where values from this table are <br />referred to elsewhere in the text (page 2.05 -36, paragraphs 4 and 5; page 2.05 -37, <br />paragraphs 3 and 5) these units should be preserved, and any references to <br />additional swell factors should be removed; <br />ii. The values in the Topsoil Resource Table should be revised in the light of the <br />above comment; <br />iii. The calculation on page 2.05 -39 should be revised with the corrected values from <br />the Topsoil Resource Table <br />iv. The Division will use the final calculated volume to be imported to calculate the <br />RCE <br />V. —w. The responses are sufficient <br />14. <br />I . Reference areas /shrubs <br />The Division supports, in principle, the proposed changes to the shrub plan. The proposed plan <br />meets the woody plant density requirements of the approved Post - mining Land Uses by establishing <br />a total of 6 shrub clumps around the mine site: 2 on the RDA, 2 at the East Portal facilities area, 1 at <br />the wash plant/pond 6, and 1 at the west end of the mine near to the site of DWDA #3. Each clump <br />will be a fenced 100 ft by 100 ft enclosure (10,000 ft2) and will be planted with 100 live transplants, <br />to give a planting density of 1 shrub per 100 ft2. The shrubs are proposed to be watered twice per <br />month for the first growing season. Success is defined an absolute standard of 65 live stems per <br />clump after 2 growing seasons. <br />This plan is a considerable departure from the previously approved plan, which saw shrubs being <br />planted over the whole 66 acres of disturbed land designated as Wildlife Habitat (1000 /acre for <br />upland and 1742 /acre for riparian). Success was to have been judged against reference areas. <br />Although the reference areas have not been sampled (and will not be retained under the proposed <br />plan), baseline data from Exhibit 15, Appendix A gives an indication of woody plant density for <br />different vegetative community types. The least dense of those would be Ponderosa Pine, Douglas <br />Fir, Oak (PDO), with a stem density of 2.62 stems/M2, which equates to — 10,600 stems /acre. By <br />contrast successfully establishing shrubs under the proposed plan would see (6* 65 =) 390 stems. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.