My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2014-07-16_REVISION - C1981044
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981044
>
2014-07-16_REVISION - C1981044
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:45:48 PM
Creation date
7/16/2014 10:41:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981044
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
7/16/2014
Doc Name
Technical Adequacy Response Package
From
Moffat County Mining, LLC
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
TR36
Email Name
JLE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
multiple services building and the miscellaneous areas. Please update the reclamation status of the areas <br />listed in the permit, beginning on page 2.05 -31.1, to reflect the reclamation completed in 2008, 2009 and <br />2010. <br />a. MCM Response: The Permit discussion of reclamation activities has been reviewed and updated, <br />as appropriate, to reflect recent site demolition and reclamation activities. Copies of the revised <br />Permit discussion accompany these responses for replacement in the PAP. <br />b. DRMS Response: This item is resolved. <br />20. Permit page 2.05 -32 contains the Williams Fork Mines' "Noxious Weed Management Plan". One of the <br />problems noted on the site in recent inspections is the Russian Knapweed infestation. The weed management <br />plan contains very little information regarding this noxious weed. There are also scattered patches of hounds <br />tongue on the site, mostly along the east side of the haul road and refuse piles. There is no individual mention <br />of the hounds tongue in the weed management plan, with the exception of a statement that spraying for white <br />top also addresses hounds tongue. Finally, based on the weed spraying requirements of the past few years, it <br />seems as though MCM may need to spray for noxious weeds on multiple occasions in order to control them. <br />Please review and amend the Noxious Weed Management Plan to include more detailed information <br />regarding the Russian Knapweed infestation that has been noted at the Williams Fork Mines and the <br />Williams Fork Strip Pit and the houndstongue that has been observed on the site. Please also amend the <br />plan to include more specific detail regarding the timing of the weed spraying and the need for multiple weed <br />spraying during a given season. <br />a. MCM responded to both items 20 and 21 below. <br />21. Permit page 2.05 -32a discusses the weed identification, mapping and tracking activities that are associated <br />with the noxious weed management plan. The text gives little detail regarding the method of weed mapping <br />and tracking. Currently, MCM provides some weed mapping and spraying detail on their annual reclamation <br />report map (Reclamation and Building Demolition Map). This map provides unconnected information and the <br />multiple colors and layers create problems in reading the map. Please update the noxious weed management <br />plan to include more detail regarding how MCM performs their noxious weed mapping and tracking <br />programs at the Williams Fork Mines and the Williams Fork Strip Pit, including whether point or area <br />features are mapped, what constitutes a weed patch for mapping purposes, etc. Please add a commitment to <br />the permit to include a separate weed tracking map in the Annual Reclamation Report. This map should <br />show the weed species encountered, their location, the method of treatment and the initial year they were <br />seen at that location. The weed tracking layers can then be removed from the Reclamation and Building <br />Demolition Map currently included in the ARR (although this map, with the reclamation information, will <br />need to remain). <br />a. MCM Response: The specific Permit text discussion for the Noxious Weed Management Plan has <br />been reviewed and revised, as appropriate to address the CDRMS's expressed concerns. MCM <br />completes an annual noxious weed assessment, and then ties weed control activities during the year <br />to the results of that assessment. Spraying typically takes place during spring and fall, targeting <br />different weed species. Weed mapping has been included on the Reclamation and Building <br />Demolition Map for convenience, and so that all relevant maintenance and reclamation information <br />is provided in a consistent, concise format. MCM will work with the CDRMS to either modify this <br />map to address the CDRMS's concerns or will create a separate map. Copies of the revised Permit <br />discussion accompany these responses for replacement in the PAP. <br />b. DBMS Response: MCM added Houndstongue to the list of species to be treated in the permit. <br />The Division reviewed the 2013 Annual Reclamation Report submitted by MCM and it appears <br />weed species and control methods are discussed in the narrative of the report. The Reclamation <br />and Building Demolition Map submitted with the report delineates areas where specific herbicides <br />were used but does not indicate where specific species are encountered. Revised page 5.05 -32.1 <br />indicates the MCM maintains a working weed program map and records both observed weed <br />occurrences by weed species, location, and extent of infestations; and treatment activities. Since <br />this information exists, it should be added to the Reclamation and Building Demolition Map <br />submitted in the Annual Reclamation Report. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.