My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2014-06-26_PERMIT FILE - M2014027 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2014027
>
2014-06-26_PERMIT FILE - M2014027 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:45:04 PM
Creation date
6/27/2014 8:45:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2014027
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
6/26/2014
Doc Name
Completeness & Materials
From
Colorado Mining and Exploration, LLC
To
DRMS
Email Name
RCO
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. George A. Holcomb <br /> April 18, 1985 <br /> Page 2 <br /> The N34°W striking, 43°SW dipping joint set was observed at several locations <br /> in the quartz latite but was not adversely affecting slope stability. These <br /> joint sets can be clearly seen in the attached computer developed schmidt <br /> plots of Call's outcrop data. Two potentially adverse wedges have been delineated <br /> by Call's data, and are shown on an attached diagram (.Joints A-C,and A-D). <br /> The joint data from the detail lines will define the potential hazards. <br /> The physical testing will permit calculation of stability and the test slopes <br /> will prove the accuracy of stability predictions. <br /> I believe it should be possible to use 60-ft high benches. This may well <br /> permit wider catch benches and steeper overall final pit slopes. Wider catch <br /> benches should provide more safety against ravel. Consideration should be <br /> given to using inclined blastholes at the final pit perimeter. This should <br /> enhance the stability of the joint controlled bench faces on the southwest <br /> facing pit walls. <br /> All in all conditions appear favorable for steeper slopes. I believe a <br /> case can be made for such an increase in overall slope angle without jepardizing <br /> slope stability. <br /> Call with your questions. <br /> Sincerely, <br /> )/aLq. aLle,e) • <br /> John F. Abel, <br /> Colorado P.E. 5642 <br /> cc: Steve Anderson <br /> • <br /> • <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.