My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2013-09-26_REVISION - C1981008
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981008
>
2013-09-26_REVISION - C1981008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:31:40 PM
Creation date
3/28/2014 7:20:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981008
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
9/26/2013
Doc Name
Permit Page Edits - Revegetation 2.05.4(2)(e)
Type & Sequence
PR8
Email Name
DAB
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
163
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
These areas will have 100% alfalfa (not including the companion, small grain, or oat crops) <br />which are well- managed, replowed, replanted, irrigated consistently and harvested. <br />- Irrigated Cropland is the sole post mining land use for the Morgan Property. The Morgan <br />property owners have the most experience and knowledge of what works best on their land. <br />WFC will coordinate and cooperate with the Morgan Property owners for decisions on the <br />Irrigated Cropland vegetation plan and management of the Morgan Property. <br />The Johnson (WFC) Property will also contain a small piece of Irrigated Cropland that will be <br />managed the same as the Morgan Property. <br />2.2 Reclaimed Irrigated Pastureland (IP) <br />These reclaimed areas consist of primarily grasses but can have some alfalfa. This <br />reclamation land use encompasses the pre -mine land use type of Pastureland - Irrigated <br />Hayland (IPH) and Pastureland - Irrigated Grass (IP). The Pastureland - Irrigated Grass areas <br />are generally not quite as well managed as Pastureland - Irrigated Hay; they have a lesser <br />percentage of alfalfa, slightly poorer soils and may not yield as much vegetation, but overall, <br />they are similar. The IPH areas were generally baled while the IP areas were generally grazed. <br />In many cases, the field may start out as an IPH field, but over time the alfalfa percentage <br />drops and the field becomes more like a Pastureland - Irrigated Grass field. Both of these pre - <br />mine areas are absorbed into the post -mine use of Reclaimed Irrigated Pastureland (IP). In all <br />cases of discussions of post mine vegetation and land use, Reclaimed Irrigated Pastureland <br />may be referred to as Irrigated Pasture (IP). <br />2.3 Pastureland - Irrigated Swales (IPSW) <br />These areas are generally low — =lying areas which drain irrigated fields around them. They are <br />not directly irrigated but usually have substantial water from the surrounding fields. They can <br />have wetland plants and these area are not managed or baled. For post -mine land use <br />success, they are measured in the same manner as Reclaimed Irrigated Pastureland. <br />2.4 Dryland Pasture (DP) <br />August 2013 PR -08 2.05.4(2)(e) - 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.