My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2014-02-26_PERMIT FILE - C1982056A
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1982056A
>
2014-02-26_PERMIT FILE - C1982056A
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:40:17 PM
Creation date
3/5/2014 8:43:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982056A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
2/26/2014
Doc Name
Exploration Drilling Information
Section_Exhibit Name
Exhibit 52 Exploration Drilling Information
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Limited - Results Archaeological Survey Form (Page 5 of 8) <br />Table 1. Previous Cultural Resource Inventories in the Project Area. <br />AHP # <br />Company <br />Year <br />Abbreviated Title <br />MC.CM.R1 <br />Western <br />1991 <br />Coal Mining Survey in Routt & Moffat Counties <br />Historical <br />RT.LM.NR151 <br />Metcalf <br />2011 <br />Twentymile Coal, Two Fish Creek Drill Locations, Routt County <br />Archaeology <br />RT.CM.R4 <br />Metcalf <br />2003 <br />Twentymile Coal, 2004 Exploration, Routt County <br />Archaeology <br />RT.LM.R84 <br />Metcalf <br />2004 <br />Twentymile Coal, Proposed 2005 Seismic Lines 2005/2006 Drill <br />Archaeology <br />Sites & BLM Block, Routt Count <br />RT.R.R1 <br />Metcalf <br />2011 <br />Twentymile Coal 16LT Borehole and Access, Routt County <br />Archaeology <br />RT.LM.R86 <br />TRC Maraia <br />2005 <br />Proposed Emerald Mountain Land Exchange, Routt County <br />Associates <br />RT.LM.NR87 <br />Metcalf <br />2007 <br />Peabody Energy Twentymile Coal West Mine Subsidence, <br />Archaeology <br />Routt, Count <br />26. Expected Results: Although there are previously recorded sites and isolated finds in the <br />surrounding areas, expectations were low for this project. This is due to the extremely small size <br />of the inventoried areas, disturbance by CRP activities and topographic characteristics (flood <br />plain, steep terrain). <br />VI. STATEMENT OF OBJECTIVES <br />27. Identify, record, and assess any cultural resources located within the potential area of effect. <br />VII. FIELD METHODS <br />28. Definitions: Site The locus of previous (50 year age minimum) human activity at which the <br />preponderance of evidence suggests either one -time diagnostically interpretable use or <br />repeated use over time, or multiple classes of activities. <br />IF One or more culturally modified objects not found within the context of a site as <br />defined above. These objects lack evidence of or potential for additional cultural <br />materials or features in the immediate vicinity. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.