My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2014-02-28_HYDROLOGY - M2012032
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Hydrology
>
Minerals
>
M2012032
>
2014-02-28_HYDROLOGY - M2012032
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:40:25 PM
Creation date
3/4/2014 3:46:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2012032
IBM Index Class Name
HYDROLOGY
Doc Date
2/28/2014
Doc Name
First quarter 2014 water analysis
From
ACZ Laboratories, Inc.
To
Star Mine Operations LLC
Email Name
RCO
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
80
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
AraZ Laboratories, Inc. <br />2773 Downhill Dnve Steamboat Spnngs, CO 80487 (800) 334 -5493 <br />Star Mine Operations LLC ACZ Project ID: L16818 <br />ACZ ID WORKNUM PARAMETER <br />METHOD <br />M335.4 - Colonmetric w/ <br />distillation <br />WG359569 <br />Cyanide, WAD <br />L16818 -01 WG359639 Chloride <br />SM4500CI -E <br />M1 <br />Matrix spike recovery was high, the recovery of the <br />WG359297 <br />Phosphorus, ortho dissolved <br />M365.1 - Automated Ascorbic <br />associated control sample (LCS or LFB) was acceptable. <br />SM4500CI -E <br />RA <br />Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />M365.1 - Automated Ascorbic <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />WG359813 <br />Residue, Filterable (TDS) @180C <br />SM2540C <br />accurate evaluation (< 1 Ox MDL). <br />WG359461 Cyanide, total <br />M335.4 - Colonmetric w/ <br />RA <br />Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />distillation <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 1 Ox MDL). <br />WG359569 Cyanide, WAD <br />SM4500 -CN I- Calorimetric w/ <br />RA <br />Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />distillation <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 1 Ox MDL). <br />WG359297 Phosphorus, oriho dissolved <br />M365.1 - Automated Ascorbic <br />RA <br />Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />Acid <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 1 Ox MDL). <br />M365.1 - Automated Ascorbic <br />ZU <br />Analysis date /time preceeds filter date /time. A portion of <br />Acid <br />sample was filtered and analyzed prior to the creation of a <br />Filter workgroup <br />WG359813 Residue, Filterable (TDS) @180C <br />SM2540C <br />HC <br />Initial analysis within holding time Reanalysis was past <br />holding time, which was required due to a QC failure during <br />the initial analysis. <br />WG359517 Residue, Non - Filterable (TSS) @105C <br />SM2540D <br />RA <br />Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 1 O MDL) <br />L16818 -02 WG359639 Chloride SM4500CI -E <br />SM4500CI -E <br />WG359461 <br />Cyanide, total <br />M335.4 - Colonmetric w/ <br />distillation <br />WG359569 <br />Cyanide, WAD <br />SM4500 -CN I- Colorimetnc w/ <br />distillation <br />WG359297 <br />Phosphorus, ortho dissolved <br />M365.1 - Automated Ascorbic <br />Acid <br />M365.1 - Automated Ascorbic <br />Acid <br />WG359813 <br />Residue, Filterable (TDS) @180C <br />SM2540C <br />WG359517 <br />Residue, Non - Filterable (TSS) @105C <br />SM2540D <br />REPAD.15.06.05.01 <br />M1 Matrix spike recovery was high, the recovery of the <br />associated control sample (LCS or LFB) was acceptable. <br />RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 1 Ox MDL). <br />RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 1 Ox MDL). <br />RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL). <br />RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 1 Ox MDL). <br />ZU Analysis date /time preceeds filter date /time. A portion of <br />sample was filtered and analyzed prior to the creation of a <br />Filter workgroup <br />HC Initial analysis within holding time Reanalysis was past <br />holding time, which was required due to a QC failure during <br />the initial analysis. <br />RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 1 Ox MDL). <br />L16818- 1402281029 Page 23 of 29 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.