My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2014-03-03_REVISION - M1988112
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1988112
>
2014-03-03_REVISION - M1988112
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:40:38 PM
Creation date
3/4/2014 8:47:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1988112
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
3/3/2014
Doc Name
Detailed inspection report TR33
From
Battle Mountain Resources, Inc.
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
TR33
Email Name
WHE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
72
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
investigation together with output tables and graphs for peak flow conditions for the 100 -year <br />and PMF analysis; a summary of the results can be found in Appendix B. <br />Flip Bucket and Plunee Basin Calculations <br />Hydraulic calculations were completed for these components of the facility because none could <br />be found in the original design documentation. Calculations are included in Appendix B. <br />A discharge flow of 210 cfs was utilized, which is the greatest discharge calculated for the drop <br />pipe by the HEC -RAS modeling when the Flip Bucket was not submerged. For these conditions <br />and the anticipated duration of flow within the Drop Structure, calculations support that the <br />dimensions for the Flip Bucket and Plunge Basin identified on the Construction Drawings are <br />reasonable. <br />Results and Conclusions from HEC -RAS Model <br />The following results and conclusions were reached based on modeling of the South Diversion <br />Ditch and Drop Structure: <br />During the 100 -year Flood: <br />1. For existing conditions, nearly all, 96 %, of the 100 -year peak flow from Areas A, B, and <br />C will be carried downstream in the South Diversion Ditch system, bypassing the tailing <br />impoundment, with only a peak flow of 12 cfs entering the impoundment at the upstream <br />end of the ditch. This minor flow into the impoundment can be eliminated by <br />constructing a 12 -inch raise of the embankment near Station 38 +43 (raise to a top <br />elevation of approximately 8626 feet). <br />2. At the peak of the 100 -year flow, an estimated 180 cfs would discharge through the Drop <br />Structure conduit, and approximately 112 cfs would flow over the embankment at the <br />Drop Structure assuming a raise is placed as described in the preceding paragraph 1. <br />3. Unless blockage occurs, the culvert should carry all flows up to approximately 170 cfs; <br />flows in excess of that rate would start to overflow at the Drop Structure. <br />During the PMF: <br />1. The peak inflow into the South Diversion Ditch system is about 4315 cfs at about <br />4.30 hours into the flood hydrograph. <br />2. Significant overflow occurs at the Drop Structure, estimated to be a peak of between <br />1336 and 1412 cfs at time 4.20 hours, depending on the analysis approach used. Refer to <br />Figure 17. <br />3. Significant overflow occurs into the tailing impoundment through the embankment <br />saddle at Station 30 +34 estimated at a peak discharge of 1930 cfs at time 4.40 hours, and <br />at the upstream end of the ditch, Station 38 +43 with a peak discharge estimate of 646 cfs <br />San Luis Project Miller Geotechnical Consultants <br />Tailing Dam Data Report 32 February 2014 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.