My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-08-26_REPORT - M1980244 (28)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Minerals
>
M1980244
>
2011-08-26_REPORT - M1980244 (28)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:42:42 PM
Creation date
2/27/2014 9:38:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980244
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
8/26/2011
Doc Name
Final Report QA 2011 Phase 5 VLF Ore Storage Aug 26, 2011 vol 1 of 3
From
CC&V
To
DRMS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
99
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ameO <br />4.1.5 Permeability Tests <br />AMEC conducted permeability tests of SLF. AMEC conducted fifty -seven (57) permeability <br />tests of re- compacted samples of SLF. The testing frequency (approximately one test per <br />903 cubic yards) exceeded the minimum specified testing frequency of one test per <br />4,000 cubic yards. Testing was performed with a flexible -wall permeameter, during material <br />processing, with back - pressure saturation and a constant rate of flow (ASTM D5084, <br />Method D). The fill was re- compacted to 95 percent of the standard Proctor (ASTM D698- <br />07) maximum dry density at the optimum moisture content (as determined from oven -dried <br />samples). Laboratory tests yielded coefficients of permeability for the CQA samples from <br />8.9 x 10 -7 cm /sec to 2.9 x 10 -9 cm /sec, all of which are less than the specified maximum <br />permeability of 1 x 10-6 cm /sec. The permeability test results for the SLF met project <br />specifications and are presented in Appendix H -3 and summarized in Table 7. <br />4.2 Field Testing and Monitoring <br />AMEC observed all fill operations in the 2011 Phase 5 VLF OSA 2nd Portion to verify, when <br />necessary, lift thickness, adequate compaction, and acceptable moisture conditions. Holes <br />made in the fill during testing were backfilled and tamped with fine bentonite materials. <br />AMEC standardized nuclear gauges at the start of each day's work according to <br />ASTM D2922. <br />4.2.1 Subgrade Preparation <br />AMEC monitored subgrade preparation, including verification that Ames compacted the <br />subgrade with a smooth drum vibratory roller (SDVR) compactor. AMEC verified that Ames <br />removed protruding rocks from the subgrade surface prior to SLF placement. AMEC verified <br />that the subgrade surface was moisture conditioned, smooth, and unyielding prior to SLF <br />placement. <br />AMEC Earth & Environmental, Inc. <br />2000 S Colorado Blvd 2 -1000 <br />Denver, CO 80222 <br />Tel 303 - 935 -6505 <br />Fax 303 - 935 -6575 www.amec com <br />20 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.