Laserfiche WebLink
Memo to PCPC <br /> Re: SUP No. 1999-002 <br /> June 9, 1999 <br /> Page 22 <br /> time longer than it takes a northbound train to exit the plant site and pass the <br /> crossing. Blocking the Lime Road crossing impairs potential emergency vehicle <br /> access to the plant site and other homes and sites along the southerly end of <br /> Lime Road. <br /> 5. The applicant has not submitted valid access easements to gain access to the <br /> proposed mining and manufacturing areas. A valid Access Easement <br /> Agreement, ownership deeds, or proof of filing of Condemnation Proceedings <br /> shall be submitted prior to the special use permit being approved. <br /> 6. Staff requests the applicant be mindful that this area is zoned A-1, Agricultural <br /> Zone District, which requires a minimum of 40 acres. Acquiring land for right-of- <br /> way in sizes less than 35 acres requires subdivision review and approval and in <br /> this zone district the size of the parcels created must be no less than 40 acres to <br /> meet the standards of the Zoning Resolution. <br /> 7. The former Special Use Permit No. 455 originally proposed a quarry and plant <br /> site within the westerly block of lands. The plant site also was to be served by a <br /> rail spur as in the current application. The access from the rail right-of-way to the <br /> westerly block of land plant site had to cross private property. The owners of the <br /> property refused to allow an access easement or to sell the land to Mineral <br /> Reserves, Inc. after repeated efforts by Mineral Reserves to acquire the acreage. <br /> A court hearing before District Judge Jack F. Seavy ruled that the Board of Land <br /> Commissioners has the power to condemn the required right-of-way for the rail <br /> access (ruling dated September 15, 1981). The Judge based his ruling on the <br /> constitutional charge to the Land Commissioners to manage State lands to <br /> achieve maximum benefits for the State. The Judge's comments were: <br /> Development of State lands is quite clearly a public use, and the fact that such <br /> development might be by a lessee of the State does not deprive the State of its <br /> statutory right of condemnation." The current applicant, Rio Grande Portland <br /> Cement Corp., has indicated difficulty in acquiring access across private lands <br /> into the property after repeated efforts to purchase it. The State Land Board as <br /> owner and lessor of the property does have the power to initiate a condemnation <br /> proceeding to acquire the necessary right-of-way (the landowners would receive <br /> fair-market value for their land). The applicant must provide valid access <br /> easements or proof of right-to-enter prior to obtaining approval of the special use <br /> permit. <br /> 8. Section 36(f) of the Pueblo County Zoning Resolution establishes the findings <br /> the Planning Commission must make in its approval of a special use permit. <br />