My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-08-10_REPORT - m1980244
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Minerals
>
M1980244
>
2010-08-10_REPORT - m1980244
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:17:42 PM
Creation date
2/26/2014 9:22:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
m1980244
IBM Index Class Name
REPORT
Doc Date
8/10/2010
Doc Name
QA REPORT Phase 4B/C Triangle Liner Certification Aug 10, 2010
From
CC&V
To
DRMS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
255
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Cripple Creek & Victor Gold Mining Company <br />Cresson Project <br />Quality Assurance Monitoring and Test Results <br />Phase 46 /C Triangle Liner Certification <br />August 10, 2010 <br />4.1.5 Permeability Tests <br />AMEC completed permeability testing of SLF material. The testing frequency (approximately <br />one test per 300 cubic yards) exceeded the minimum specified testing frequency of one test per <br />5,000 cubic yards. Testing was performed with a flexible -wall permeameter with back - pressure <br />saturation and a constant rate of flow (ASTM D5084, Method D). The SLF was remolded to <br />95% of the maximum dry density (ASTM D698) and the optimum moisture content. Laboratory <br />testing yielded a coefficient of permeability for the CQA samples met the project specifications. <br />The permeability test results for the SLF are presented in Appendix F. <br />4.2 Field Testing and Monitoring <br />AMEC observed all fill operations in the construction to verify, when necessary; lift thickness, <br />adequate compaction, and acceptable moisture conditions. When AMEC performed nuclear <br />density testing, holes made in the fill during testing were filled by tamping fine SLF material into <br />the holes. AMEC standardized nuclear gauges at the start of each day's work according to <br />ASTM D2922. <br />4.2.1 Subgrade Preparation <br />AMEC monitored subgrade preparation, including verification that Ames compacted the <br />subgrade with a smooth drum vibratory compactor. AMEC verified that Ames removed <br />protruding rocks from the subgrade surface prior to SLF placement. AMEC verified that the <br />subgrade surface was moisture conditioned, smooth, and unyielding prior to SLF placement. <br />4.2.2 Site Grading <br />Structural fill placement was not required as part of the certification area. However, existing <br />material was shaped or compacted for the acceptance of SLF placement. <br />4.2.3 Soil Liner Fill <br />Field testing included monitoring of placement and preparation of SLF for geomembrane <br />deployment, testing in -place moisture and density with a nuclear gauge, and monitoring depth <br />verification. <br />4.2.3.1 Field Monitoring <br />AMEC observed SLF placement to verify lift thickness, adequate compaction, acceptable <br />moisture conditions, final compacted thickness, and suitability for geomembrane deployment. <br />AMEC identified angular particles on the fill surface, ruts, and desiccation cracks, and brought <br />these features to the attention of Ames for repair. When necessary, AMEC verified these <br />repairs were completed. Where necessary, Ames laborers placed fines from their SLF <br />processing plant or from temporary piles of fine SLF to smooth and re- compact the fill surface in <br />5 \PROJECTS \1125E CCV CQA \H2 - DESIGN \TRIANGLE \FINAL \TRIANGLE CERTIFICATION REPORT FINAL REV1 DOC 11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.