2010-11-17_REVISION - C1981008 ‎(2)‎

• Permit No: C1981008
• IBM Index Class Name: REVISION
• Doc Date: 11/17/2010
• Doc Name: Transcript MLRB Hearing
• Type & Sequence: PR6
• Email Name: DIH
• Email Name: MPB
• Media Type: D
• Archive: No

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
11
permit revision, Richard Weimer's ranch, Carvers,
Coopers, all of them, and they filed it in the
length of time that it was necessary, and it was
filed, and it asked for a formal hearing.
MR. FUGATE: The point I'm making is
whether or not they did file a request that
classified them as parties and requested another
formal hearing, it's not a second hearing request.
What they're requesting to
participate in at that time was already a scheduled
hearing. The coal regs are written such that that
initial objection triggers the 30 -day hearing
process. We held a hearing, which then set it for
today's date.
Any objection letters, comment
letters, requests for hearing submitted subsequent
to that, they're all -- they're all combined into
this hearing. We can't have a series of hearings
based on every -- every request that we receive, and
it's not how the coal act is set up.
MS. TURNER: That is not what Bruce
Stover said. I specifically told him, we have 35
other people that -- the public comment period did
not end until November 15, and he told me -- I said,
What about all these other people here? Are they